Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
White v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Smith v. State, 200 Ark. 767 , 140 S.W.2d-675 (1940) (holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the. ground that -the principal witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime); see also White v. State, 2014 Ark. 348 , 438 S.W.3d 916 ; Taylor v. State, 303 Ark. 586 , 799 S.W.2d 519 (1990) (A witness’s recantation of part of his trial testimony was not a ground for the writ, as recantation of testimony did not fit within the remedy.) To the extent that Pinder’s assertions concerning the allegedly false testimon 2015Smith v. State, 200 Ark. 767 , 140 S.W.2d-675 (1940) (holding that the writ was not available to afford relief on the. ground that -the principal witness against the accused had recanted and that others since the accused’s conviction had confessed to the crime); see also White v. State, 2014 Ark. 348 , 438 S.W.3d 916 ; Taylor v. State, 303 Ark. 586 , 799 S.W.2d 519 (1990) (A witness’s recantation of part of his trial testimony was not a ground for the writ, as recantation of testimony did not fit within the remedy.) To the extent that Pinder’s assertions concerning the allegedly false testimon | 2 | 2 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2017See generally Taylor v. State, 303 Ark. 586 , 799 S.W.2d 519 (1990) (A witness’s recantation of part of his trial testimony was not a ground for the writ, as the recantation of the testimony did not fit within the remedy.); Smith v. State, 200 Ark. 767 , 140 S.W.2d 675 (1940). 2017See generally Taylor v. State, 303 Ark. 586 , 799 S.W.2d 519 (1990) (A witness’s recantation of part of his trial testimony was not a ground for the writ, as the recantation of the testimony did not fit within the remedy.); Smith v. State, 200 Ark. 767 , 140 S.W.2d 675 (1940). | 1 | 3 |
Pinder v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Evans v. State, 2016 Ark. 377, at 6-7 , 601 S.W.3d 819 , 823 (per curiam); Pinder, 2015 Ark. 423, at 4 , 474 S.W.3d at 493 . 2017Evans v. State, 2016 Ark. 377, at 6-7 , 601 S.W.3d 819 , 823 (per curiam); Pinder, 2015 Ark. 423, at 4 , 474 S.W.3d at 493 . | 1 | 2 |
Evans v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Evans v. State, 2016 Ark. 377, at 6-7 , 601 S.W.3d 819 , 823 (per curiam); Pinder, 2015 Ark. 423, at 4 , 474 S.W.3d at 493 . 2017Evans v. State, 2016 Ark. 377, at 6-7 , 501 S.W.3d 819, 823 (per curiam); see also Wallace v. State, 2015 Ark. 349, at 12 , 471 S.W.3d 192, 200 (per curiam). | 1 | 2 |
Wallace v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Evans v. State, 2016 Ark. 377, at 6-7 , 501 S.W.3d 819, 823 (per curiam); see also Wallace v. State, 2015 Ark. 349, at 12 , 471 S.W.3d 192, 200 (per curiam). 2017Evans v. State, 2016 Ark. 377, at 6-7 , 501 S.W.3d 819, 823 (per curiam); see also Wallace v. State, 2015 Ark. 349, at 12 , 471 S.W.3d 192, 200 (per curiam). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. State
green
2 sentences2017See generally Taylor v. State, 303 Ark. 586 , 799 S.W.2d 519 (1990) (A witness’s recantation of part of his trial testimony was not a ground for the writ, as the recantation of the testimony did not fit within the remedy.); Smith v. State, 200 Ark. 767 , 140 S.W.2d 675 (1940). 2017See generally Taylor v. State, 303 Ark. 586 , 799 S.W.2d 519 (1990) (A witness’s recantation of part of his trial testimony was not a ground for the writ, as the recantation of the testimony did not fit within the remedy.); Smith v. State, 200 Ark. 767 , 140 S.W.2d 675 (1940). | 3 | 2015–2017 |
Chatmon v. State
green
1 sentence2017He has offered no proof that the State knowingly utilized false testimony or otherwise suborned perjury, and we have held that a petitioner’s allegation 4 Cite as 2017 Ark. 229 that a witness gave false testimony at trial, in and of itself, does not give rise to a showing of fundamental error that requires issuance of the writ. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.