Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
51 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2025 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Thingvoldgreen2 sentences2024See People v. Carey, 2018 IL 121371, ¶ 22 (noting that when a charging instrument is challenged for the first time on appeal, we consider “ ‘whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense’ ” (quoting People v. Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d 441, 448 (1991))). 2023“In other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the [charging instrument] prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. (quoting People v. Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d 441, 448 (1991)). ¶ 24 The State urges us to review whether defendant was prejudiced in the preparation of her defense. | 11 | 24 |
People v. Phillipsgreen2 sentences2018"In other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense." Thingvold , 145 Ill. 2d at 448 , 164 Ill.Dec. 877 , 584 N.E.2d 89 ; accord Rowell , 229 Ill. 2d at 93 , 321 Ill.Dec. 765 , 890 N.E.2d 487 ; People v. Phillips , 215 Ill. 2d 554 , 562, 294 Ill.Dec. 624 , 831 N.E.2d 574 (2005). 2018"In other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense." Thingvold , 145 Ill. 2d at 448 , 164 Ill.Dec. 877 , 584 N.E.2d 89 ; accord Rowell , 229 Ill. 2d at 93 , 321 Ill.Dec. 765 , 890 N.E.2d 487 ; People v. Phillips , 215 Ill. 2d 554 , 562, 294 Ill.Dec. 624 , 831 N.E.2d 574 (2005). | 4 | 5 |
People v. Careygreen2 sentences2024See People v. Carey, 2018 IL 121371, ¶ 22 (noting that when a charging instrument is challenged for the first time on appeal, we consider “ ‘whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense’ ” (quoting People v. Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d 441, 448 (1991))). 2023See People v. Carey, 2018 IL 121371, ¶ 22 (in criminal prosecution, where defendant challenges indictment for first time on appeal, court should consider only whether the alleged defect in the indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense). | 3 | 4 |
People v. Cuadradogreen2 sentences2022“In other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense.” People v. Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d 441, 448 (1991); see also People v. Cuadrado, 214 Ill. 2d 79, 86 (2005) (noting “posttrial motions attacking the sufficiency of an indictment are subject to a prejudice standard”). -8- ¶ 38 In determining whether prejudice exists, “the reviewing court may resort to the record.” Carey, 2018 IL 121371 , ¶ 22. 2005See also Cuadrado, 214 Ill. 2d at 86-88 (to prevail in a challenge to an indictment that is raised for the first time on appeal, the defendant must show prejudice in the preparation of her defense); People v. Phillips, 215 Ill. 2d 554, 562 (2005) (same). | 3 | 3 |
People v. Pujouegreen2 sentences1996(People v. Gilmore (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 23, 29 , 344 N.E.2d 456, 460 .) Rather, it is sufficient that the [indictment] 'apprised the accused of the precise offense charged with sufficient specificity to prepare his defense and allow pleading a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct.’ (People v. Pujoue (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 335, 339 , 335 N.E.2d 437, 440 ; see also [People v.] Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d [441,] 448, 584 N.E.2d [89,] 91.) Tn other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defen 1996(People v. Gilmore (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 23, 29 , 344 N.E.2d 456, 460 .) Rather, it is sufficient that the [indictment] 'apprised the accused of the precise offense charged with sufficient specificity to prepare his defense and allow pleading a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct.’ (People v. Pujoue (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 335, 339 , 335 N.E.2d 437, 440 ; see also [People v.] Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d [441,] 448, 584 N.E.2d [89,] 91.) Tn other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defen | 2 | 6 |
People v. Brockgreen2 sentences2018See People v. Brock, 2015 IL App (1st) 133404, ¶¶ 18, 24 (finding that section 6 of the Act does not impose a registration requirement and “one can ‘report’ without registering”). 2017See People v. Brock , 2015 IL App (1st) 133404 , ¶¶ 18, 24, 398 Ill.Dec. 864 , 45 N.E.3d 295 (finding that section 6 of the Act does not impose a registration requirement and "one can 'report' without registering."). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Rowellgreen2 sentences2018"In other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense." Thingvold , 145 Ill. 2d at 448 , 164 Ill.Dec. 877 , 584 N.E.2d 89 ; accord Rowell , 229 Ill. 2d at 93 , 321 Ill.Dec. 765 , 890 N.E.2d 487 ; People v. Phillips , 215 Ill. 2d 554 , 562, 294 Ill.Dec. 624 , 831 N.E.2d 574 (2005). 2018"In other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense." Thingvold , 145 Ill. 2d at 448 , 164 Ill.Dec. 877 , 584 N.E.2d 89 ; accord Rowell , 229 Ill. 2d at 93 , 321 Ill.Dec. 765 , 890 N.E.2d 487 ; People v. Phillips , 215 Ill. 2d 554 , 562, 294 Ill.Dec. 624 , 831 N.E.2d 574 (2005). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Davisgreen2 sentences2005In other words, the question on appeal is ‘whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense.’ Thingvold , 145 Ill. 2d at 448 .” People v. Davis , 205 Ill. 2d 349, 375-76 (2002). 2005In other words, the question on appeal is ‘whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense.’ Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d at 448 .” People v. Davis, 205 Ill. 2d 349, 375-76 (2002). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Scottgreen2 sentences2003People v. Aud , 52 Ill. 2d 368, 370 (1972); People v. Scott , 285 Ill. 2003People v. Aud, 52 Ill. 2d 368, 370 (1972); People v. Scott, 285 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Audgreen2 sentences2003People v. Aud , 52 Ill. 2d 368, 370 (1972); People v. Scott , 285 Ill. 2003People v. Aud, 52 Ill. 2d 368, 370 (1972); People v. Scott, 285 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2000See People v. Jones , 245 Ill. 2000See People v. Jones, 245 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Gilmoregreen2 sentences1996(People v. Gilmore (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 23, 29 , 344 N.E.2d 456, 460 .) Rather, it is sufficient that the [indictment] 'apprised the accused of the precise offense charged with sufficient specificity to prepare his defense and allow pleading a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct.’ (People v. Pujoue (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 335, 339 , 335 N.E.2d 437, 440 ; see also [People v.] Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d [441,] 448, 584 N.E.2d [89,] 91.) Tn other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defen 1996(People v. Gilmore (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 23, 29 , 344 N.E.2d 456, 460 .) Rather, it is sufficient that the [indictment] 'apprised the accused of the precise offense charged with sufficient specificity to prepare his defense and allow pleading a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct.’ (People v. Pujoue (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 335, 339 , 335 N.E.2d 437, 440 ; see also [People v.] Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d [441,] 448, 584 N.E.2d [89,] 91.) Tn other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defen | 1 | 6 |
People v. Jeffersongreen2 sentences1995See People v. Jefferson (1976), 35 Ill. 1985App. 3d 424, 426 .) The court then went on to state that the determination of whether the trial court abused its discretion “is to be considered in light of the diligence shown on the part of the defendant [citations] as well as the extent such a denial embarrassed the defendant in preparing his defense and prejudiced his rights. [Citations.]” 35 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Hughesgreen2 sentences1996(People v. Gilmore (1976), 63 Ill. 2d 23, 29 , 344 N.E.2d 456, 460 .) Rather, it is sufficient that the [indictment] 'apprised the accused of the precise offense charged with sufficient specificity to prepare his defense and allow pleading a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct.’ (People v. Pujoue (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 335, 339 , 335 N.E.2d 437, 440 ; see also [People v.] Thingvold, 145 Ill. 2d [441,] 448, 584 N.E.2d [89,] 91.) Tn other words, the appellate court should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defen 1996App. 3d at 471-72 , 592 N.E.2d at 669 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Davis
green
2 sentences2011Davis, 217 Ill. 2d at 479 , 841 N.E.2d at 888 . 2011Davis, 217 Ill. 2d at 479 , 841 N.E.2d at 888 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
People v. Smith
green
2 sentences2001If, however, the information or indictment is attacked before trial, the information must strictly comply with the pleading requirements of the Code. 720 ILCS 5/3-5, 3-6, 3-7 (1996); People v. Smith , 99 Ill. 2d 467 (1984); Gilmore , 63 Ill. 2d at 29 ; Pujoue , 61 Ill. 2d at 339 . 2001If, however, the information or indictment is attacked before trial, the information must strictly comply with the pleading requirements of the Code. 720 ILCS 5/3 — 5, 3 — 6, 3 — 7 (West 1996); People v. Smith, 99 Ill. 2d 467 (1984); Gilmore, 63 Ill. 2d at 29 ; Pujoue, 61 Ill. 2d at 339 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Davis
green
2 sentences1994(People v. Davis (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 3d 534, 413 N.E.2d 413 .) If a defendant is sufficiently advised of the charges filed against him, the convictions may be sustained. 1991(People v. Davis (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 534 , 413 N.E.2d 413 .) Otherwise, if the charge is submitted in writing, and states (1) the name of the offense; (2) the statutory provision allegedly violated; (3) the name of the accused; (4) the date and county of the offense; and (5) sets forth the nature and elements of the offense, the indictment should not be dismissed nor will the conviction based on the indictment be reversed on that ground. | 2 | 1991–1994 |
The PEOPLE v. Canaday
green
2 sentences1979People v. Canaday (1971), 49 Ill. 2d 416, 427 , 275 N.E.2d 356 ; People v. Allen (1976), 35 Ill. 1979People v. Canaday (1971), 49 Ill. 2d 416, 427 , 275 N.E.2d 356 ; People v. Allen (1976), 35 Ill. | 2 | 1976–1979 |
People v. Libricz
green
1 sentence2025Specifically, “[i]n that instance, it is sufficient that the indictment apprised the accused of the precise offense charged with enough specificity to (1) allow preparation of his defense and (2) allow pleading a resulting conviction as a bar to future prosecution arising out of the same conduct. [Citation.] In other words, the appellate court - 11 - should consider whether the defect in the information or indictment prejudiced the defendant in preparing his defense. [Citations.] In determining whether prejudice exists, the reviewing court may resort to the record. [Citation.] Thus, the questi | 1 | 2025–2025 |
People v. Talidis
green
1 sentence2023The court also determined that denying the request for a continuance inhibited the defendant in preparing his defense and prejudiced his rights, - 29 - 2023 IL App (2d) 220109 as counsel was given complete discovery only after trial. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
People v. Childs
green
1 sentence2013People v. Childs, 407 Ill. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
The PEOPLE v. Figgers
green
1 sentence1996Figgers, 23 Ill. 2d at 518-19 ; Givens, 135 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Givens
green
1 sentence1996Figgers, 23 Ill. 2d at 518-19 ; Givens, 135 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
People v. Godina
green
1 sentence1996People v. Godina, 223 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
The People v. Blumenfeld
green
1 sentence1995(Lott, 66 Ill. 2d at 296-97 , citing People v. Blumenfeld (1928), 330 Ill. 474 .) While resolution of whether there has been an abuse of discretion in denying a motion for continuance based upon defense counsel’s lack of preparation is dependent upon the particular facts and circumstances of each case, it has been held that such a determination is to be considered in light of the diligence shown on the part of the defendant as well as the extent such a denial hindered the defendant in preparing his defense and prejudiced his rights. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Lott
green
1 sentence1995(Lott, 66 Ill. 2d at 296-97 , citing People v. Blumenfeld (1928), 330 Ill. 474 .) While resolution of whether there has been an abuse of discretion in denying a motion for continuance based upon defense counsel’s lack of preparation is dependent upon the particular facts and circumstances of each case, it has been held that such a determination is to be considered in light of the diligence shown on the part of the defendant as well as the extent such a denial hindered the defendant in preparing his defense and prejudiced his rights. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
People v. Donnenfeld
neutral
1 sentence1988(People v. Alexander (1982), 93 Ill. 2d 73 , 442 N.E.2d 887 ; People v. Donnenfeld (1978), 62 Ill. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. Alexander
green
2 sentences1988(People v. Alexander (1982), 93 Ill. 2d 73 , 442 N.E.2d 887 ; People v. Donnenfeld (1978), 62 Ill. 1988(People v. Alexander (1982), 93 Ill. 2d 73 , 442 N.E.2d 887 ; People v. Donnenfeld (1978), 62 Ill. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1980(People v. Johnson (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 332, 339 ; People v. Pujoue (1975), 61 Ill. 2d 335, 340 .) The variance between the complaint and the proof neither misled the defendant in preparing his defense nor subjected him to the danger of double jeopardy. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| People v. Allen green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Brooks
neutral
1 sentence1979App. 3d 983, 986 , 350 N.E.2d 821 .) Unless it appears that the refusal to grant a continuance embarrassed the defendant in preparing his defense or prejudiced his rights, the conviction should be affirmed. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| People v. Brown neutral | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Gatheright neutral | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Felder neutral | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Hicks green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| People v. Lyons green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Giles v. Maryland green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| State v. Thompson green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| William B. Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| Ex Parte Cherry neutral | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| McMullen v. Maxwell green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| State v. O'Dell Fowler green | 1 | 1972–1972 |
| The People v. Braverman green | 1 | 1957–1957 |
| People v. Taranto neutral | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.