Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Oliver
green
2 sentences1998Id. 1998Id. | 2 | 1989–1998 |
Aileen H. Char Life Interest v. Maricopa County
green
1 sentence2023Char Life Int. v. Maricopa County, 208 Ariz. 286 , 298–99, ¶¶ 36– 41 (2004) (affirming the tax court’s ruling on a post-judgment Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment). ¶7 Here, Pope’s motion for new trial was timely filed, see Ariz. R. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences1995Id. at 29 , 545 P.2d 946 . 1995Id. at 29 , 545 P.2d 946 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Grice
green
2 sentences1989In Grice , because there *472 was no Pope hearing, and the defendant failed to first establish that “the mother did not know that her daughter had previously engaged in sexual intercourse with her boyfriend,” the court concluded that the defendant’s motive defense “existed only in the mind of his counsel.” Grice, 123 Ariz. at 70 , 597 P.2d at 552 . 1989In Grice , because there *472 was no Pope hearing, and the defendant failed to first establish that “the mother did not know that her daughter had previously engaged in sexual intercourse with her boyfriend,” the court concluded that the defendant’s motive defense “existed only in the mind of his counsel.” Grice, 123 Ariz. at 70 , 597 P.2d at 552 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Quinn
green
2 sentences1979The Court of Appeals, in State v. Quinn, 121 Ariz. 582 , 592 P.2d 778 (App.1978), held that failure to request.a Pope hearing justifies excluding cross-examination of a rape victim’s prior sexual conduct. 4 . 1979The Court of Appeals, in State v. Quinn, 121 Ariz. 582 , 592 P.2d 778 (App.1978), held that failure to request.a Pope hearing justifies excluding cross-examination of a rape victim’s prior sexual conduct. 4 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Dove v. Justices of Criminal Court
neutral
2 sentences1979Cf. People v. Crawford, 253 Cal.App.2d 524 , 61 Cal.Rptr. 472 (1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 1254 , 20 L.Ed.2d 108 . 4 From all that appears in the record, the plot conceived by appellant existed only in the mind of his counsel. *71 Appellant also contends that the refusal to grant him a continuance when the prosecuting attorney brought the doctor’s records into court denied him due process. 1979Cf. People v. Crawford, 253 Cal.App.2d 524 , 61 Cal.Rptr. 472 (1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 1254 , 20 L.Ed.2d 108 . 4 From all that appears in the record, the plot conceived by appellant existed only in the mind of his counsel. *71 Appellant also contends that the refusal to grant him a continuance when the prosecuting attorney brought the doctor’s records into court denied him due process. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority
green
1 sentence1979Cf. People v. Crawford, 253 Cal.App.2d 524 , 61 Cal.Rptr. 472 (1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 1254 , 20 L.Ed.2d 108 . 4 From all that appears in the record, the plot conceived by appellant existed only in the mind of his counsel. *71 Appellant also contends that the refusal to grant him a continuance when the prosecuting attorney brought the doctor’s records into court denied him due process. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Crawford
green
2 sentences1979Cf. People v. Crawford, 253 Cal.App.2d 524 , 61 Cal.Rptr. 472 (1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 1254 , 20 L.Ed.2d 108 . 4 From all that appears in the record, the plot conceived by appellant existed only in the mind of his counsel. *71 Appellant also contends that the refusal to grant him a continuance when the prosecuting attorney brought the doctor’s records into court denied him due process. 1979Cf. People v. Crawford, 253 Cal.App.2d 524 , 61 Cal.Rptr. 472 (1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 1006 , 88 S.Ct. 1254 , 20 L.Ed.2d 108 . 4 From all that appears in the record, the plot conceived by appellant existed only in the mind of his counsel. *71 Appellant also contends that the refusal to grant him a continuance when the prosecuting attorney brought the doctor’s records into court denied him due process. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.