Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Arizona opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Caseygreen2 sentences2004State v. Casey, 205 Ariz. 359, ¶ 8 , 71 P.3d 351, 354 (2003). ¶ 4 Newnom was charged with aggravated domestic violence pursuant to § 13-3601.02, which provides in part that “[a] person is guilty of aggravated domestic violence if the person within a period of sixty months commits a third or subsequent violation of a domestic violence offense.” In Galati , our supreme court analyzed A.R.S. § 28-1383, *508 the statute governing aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), which provides that a person is guilty of aggravated DUI if that person “[wjithin a period of sixty months 2004State v. Casey, 205 Ariz. 359, ¶ 8 , 71 P.3d 351, 354 (2003). ¶ 4 Newnom was charged with aggravated domestic violence pursuant to § 13-3601.02, which provides in part that “[a] person is guilty of aggravated domestic violence if the person within a period of sixty months commits a third or subsequent violation of a domestic violence offense.” In Galati , our supreme court analyzed A.R.S. § 28-1383, *508 the statute governing aggravated driving under the influence of an intoxicant (DUI), which provides that a person is guilty of aggravated DUI if that person “[wjithin a period of sixty months | 2 | 2 |
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2026Montgomery v. Harris, 237 Ariz. 98, 101, ¶ 13 (2014). ¶13 “A person is guilty of aggravated domestic violence if the person within a period of eighty-four months commits a third or subsequent violation of a domestic violence offense.” A.R.S. § 13- 3601.02(A). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Newnomgreen1 sentence2017We agree. 1 “We view the facts in the light most favorable to sustaining the conviction.” State v. Newnom, 208 Ariz. 507, 507, ¶ 2 (App. 2004). 2 STATE v. TORRES Decision of the Court ¶5 As charged here, a person is guilty of aggravated domestic violence if “within a period of eighty-four months [he] commits a third or subsequent violation of a domestic violence offense.” A.R.S. § 13- 3601.02(A). | 1 | 1 |
Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. Pettagreen1 sentence2015State v. Moody, 208 Ariz. 424 , 456–58, ¶¶ 124, 135 (2004); Desert Palm Surgical Grp., P.L.C. v. Petta, 236 Ariz. 568, 581, ¶ 37 (App. 2015). ¶10 Estrada was charged with aggravated domestic violence, which requires proof of “a third or subsequent violation of a domestic violence offense” within eighty-four months of a second domestic violence offense, defined in A.R.S. § 13-3601(A) as a homicide, assault, kidnapping, sexual assault, burglary, or other violent act directed toward a closely associated or related victim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Waicelunasgreen2 sentences1986See generally, State v. Waicelunas, 138 Ariz. 16 , 672 P.2d 968 (App.1983); Traylor v. Thorneycroft, 134 Ariz. 482 , 657 P.2d 895 (App.1982). 1986See generally, State v. Waicelunas, 138 Ariz. 16 , 672 P.2d 968 (App.1983); Traylor v. Thorneycroft, 134 Ariz. 482 , 657 P.2d 895 (App.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Moody
green
1 sentence2015State v. Moody, 208 Ariz. 424 , 456–58, ¶¶ 124, 135 (2004); Desert Palm Surgical Grp., P.L.C. v. Petta, 236 Ariz. 568, 581, ¶ 37 (App. 2015). ¶10 Estrada was charged with aggravated domestic violence, which requires proof of “a third or subsequent violation of a domestic violence offense” within eighty-four months of a second domestic violence offense, defined in A.R.S. § 13-3601(A) as a homicide, assault, kidnapping, sexual assault, burglary, or other violent act directed toward a closely associated or related victim. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Traylor v. Thorneycroft
green
2 sentences1986See generally, State v. Waicelunas, 138 Ariz. 16 , 672 P.2d 968 (App.1983); Traylor v. Thorneycroft, 134 Ariz. 482 , 657 P.2d 895 (App.1982). 1986See generally, State v. Waicelunas, 138 Ariz. 16 , 672 P.2d 968 (App.1983); Traylor v. Thorneycroft, 134 Ariz. 482 , 657 P.2d 895 (App.1982). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.