Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green1 sentence2019The trial court may consider a multitude of factors in its consideration.5 Here, the evidence is akin to that proffered in 5 The supreme court emphasized that a trial court may consider the nonexclusive list of factors set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 597 (1993): (1) whether the technique can and has been tested; (2) whether the theory or 31 Han Tak Lee and Behn. | 1 | 1 |
Vialpando v. Peoplegreen1 sentence2017See Vialpando v. People, 727 P.2d 1090, 1095-96 (Colo. 1986). | 1 | 1 |
Fellhauer v. Peoplegreen2 sentences2003Fellhauer v. People, 167 Colo. 320, 332 , 447 P.2d 986, 992 (1968). 2003Fellhauer v. People, 167 Colo. 320, 332 , 447 P.2d 986, 992 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Anderson
green
1 sentence1999Id. at 359 (quoting People v. Adams, 53 Cal.App.3d 109 , 125 Cal.Rptr. 518 (1975)) (original emphasis deleted). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Adams
green
2 sentences1999Id. at 359 (quoting People v. Adams, 53 Cal.App.3d 109 , 125 Cal.Rptr. 518 (1975)) (original emphasis deleted). 1999Id. at 359 (quoting People v. Adams, 53 Cal.App.3d 109 , 125 Cal.Rptr. 518 (1975)) (original emphasis deleted). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
People v. Watkins
green
2 sentences1982Recognizing, however, the multitude of factors significant to the sentencing process, see People v. Watkins, supra , and the fact that the weighing of these factors in some cases will reflect that a sentence within the presumptive range would be inappropriately high or low, the General Assembly extended the sentencing limits on both ends. 1982Recognizing, however, the multitude of factors significant to the sentencing process, see People v. Watkins, supra, ‘and the fact that the weighing of these factors in some cases will reflect that a sentence within the presumptive range would be inappropriately high or low, the General Assembly extended the sentencing limits on both ends. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
cluster 373982
green
1 sentence1981Here, the trial court considered the multitude of factors set forth in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974), and approved in Battle v. Anderson, 614 F.2d 251 (10th Cir. 1980), and set the fees accordingly. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
cluster 315529
green
1 sentence1981Here, the trial court considered the multitude of factors set forth in Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc., 488 F.2d 714 (5th Cir. 1974), and approved in Battle v. Anderson, 614 F.2d 251 (10th Cir. 1980), and set the fees accordingly. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.