absence of mitigating factors (District of Columbia) · Go Syfert
← District of Columbia issues

absence of mitigating factors in District of Columbia

6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Killitzgreen
orctapp · 1982 · cited in 4 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2006
2 sentences

2006See id. at 1384. [13] Killitz has been cited, and followed, by numerous courts for the proposition that when a student is in school, and is compelled by school authorities to leave his normal classroom setting to speak with the police in a private location, the interview is custodial within the meaning of Miranda . [14] Unlike the cases where we have found that custody was not present despite significant displays of police authority, in this case there were no words or actions on the part of the officer to mitigate the compulsive atmosphere.

2005See id. at 1384. 13 Killitz has been cited, and followed, by numerous courts for the proposition that when a student is in school, and is compelled by school authorities to leave his normal classroom setting to speak with the police in a private location, the interview is custodial within the meaning of Miranda . 14 Unlike the cases where we have found that custody was not present despite significant displays of police authority, in this case there were no words or actions on the part of the officer to mitigate the compulsive atmosphere.

44
Matter of Goldsteingreen
dc · 1984 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003See, e.g., In re Shaw, 775 A.2d at 1125-26 (imposing public censure on attorney who failed to pay a third-party medical provider and charged an excessive legal fee); In re Mitchell, 727 A.2d 308, 315 (D.C.1999) (public censure for failure to deliver client funds to client in conjunction with other ethical violations); In re Goldstein, 471 A.2d 267, 268 (D.C.1984) (public censure for failure to deliver funds to client and neglect of a legal matter entrusted to the attorney).

11
In Re Mitchellgreen
dc · 1999 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003See, e.g., In re Shaw, 775 A.2d at 1125-26 (imposing public censure on attorney who failed to pay a third-party medical provider and charged an excessive legal fee); In re Mitchell, 727 A.2d 308, 315 (D.C.1999) (public censure for failure to deliver client funds to client in conjunction with other ethical violations); In re Goldstein, 471 A.2d 267, 268 (D.C.1984) (public censure for failure to deliver funds to client and neglect of a legal matter entrusted to the attorney).

11
In Re Shawgreen
dc · 2001 · cited in 1 District of Columbia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003See, e.g., In re Shaw, 775 A.2d at 1125-26 (imposing public censure on attorney who failed to pay a third-party medical provider and charged an excessive legal fee); In re Mitchell, 727 A.2d 308, 315 (D.C.1999) (public censure for failure to deliver client funds to client in conjunction with other ethical violations); In re Goldstein, 471 A.2d 267, 268 (D.C.1984) (public censure for failure to deliver funds to client and neglect of a legal matter entrusted to the attorney).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
In re Omwenga green
dc · 2012
1 sentence

2013Id. at 1239 .

12013–2013

Statutes the citing opinions construe

DC § D.C. Code § 23-104 (4) DC § D.C. Code § 23-113 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 39 (1985–2026) IL 25 (1983–2000) CO 23 (1995–2013) FL 8 (1981–2019) NY 7 (1986–2020) NJ 7 (1984–2022) WA 7 (1987–2007) DC 6 (2003–2013) MA 5 (1983–2009) MD 4 (1987–2018) OH 4 (1989–2020) IN 3 (1987–1990) UT 2 (1982–2024) LA 2 (2003–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check