Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Delaware opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Delaware courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
LaNUOVA D & B, SpA v. Bowe Co., Inc.green2 sentences2025Feb. 5, 2019). 19 LaNuova, 513 A.2d at 768 n.3 (“It is conceivable that a tort claim could enjoy a dual jurisdictional basis under (c)(1) and (c)(4) if the indicia of activity set forth under (c)(4) were sufficiently extensive to reach the transactional level of (c)(1) and there was a nexus between the tort claim and transaction of business or performance of work.”). 20 See App. to Appellant’s Opening Br. at A035 (State Farm Insurance Policy) (covering accidents “that occur in the United States of America and its territories” and promising to adjust coverage limits to meet “the minimum mandato 2025AB at 14–17. 12 were sufficiently extensive to reach the transactional level of (c)(1) and there was a nexus between the tort claim and transaction of business or performance of work.62 Thereafter, this Court articulated the “dual jurisdiction” theory for the first time in Boone v. Oy Partek Ab.63 Boone applied the theory to confer jurisdiction over a foreign asbestos manufacturer when it contracted with a New York distributor and sold up to 50 tons of asbestos to Delaware per month for ten years, causing injuries in Delaware.64 Boone noted that the exercise of jurisdiction based on the manufa | 1 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Delaware. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Boone v. Oy Partek Ab
green
2 sentences2023“In fact, the only limit placed on § 3104 is that it remain within the constraints of the Due Process Clause.” 72 So, when a defendant has sufficient contacts with Delaware and the plaintiffs’ claim arises out of those contacts, dual jurisdiction is appropriate.73 When analyzing if dual jurisdiction is satisfied, the court looks to whether there was an intent or purpose on the part of the defendant to serve the Delaware market.74 If the intent to serve the 71 LaNuova D&B, S.p.A. v. Bowe Co., Inc., 513 A.2d 764 n.3 (Del. 1986). 72 Boone, 724 A.2d at 1157 . 73 Id. 74 Id. at 1158 . 14 Delaware ma 2023“In fact, the only limit placed on § 3104 is that it remain within the constraints of the Due Process Clause.” 72 So, when a defendant has sufficient contacts with Delaware and the plaintiffs’ claim arises out of those contacts, dual jurisdiction is appropriate.73 When analyzing if dual jurisdiction is satisfied, the court looks to whether there was an intent or purpose on the part of the defendant to serve the Delaware market.74 If the intent to serve the 71 LaNuova D&B, S.p.A. v. Bowe Co., Inc., 513 A.2d 764 n.3 (Del. 1986). 72 Boone, 724 A.2d at 1157 . 73 Id. 74 Id. at 1158 . 14 Delaware ma | 3 | 2017–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.