judge may consider whatever factors (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

judge may consider whatever factors in Louisiana

50 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. McKethangreen
lactapp · 1984 · cited in 25 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1986–1996
2 sentences

1996State v. McKethan, 459 So.2d 72 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

1996State v. McKethan, 459 So.2d 72 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (La.1983).

125

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (26)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Tully green
lactapp · 1983
2 sentences

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

2003State v. Bradford, supra; State v. Woodman, 28,-004 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/96), 666 So.2d 1255 , writ denied, 96-0489 (La.5/3/96), 672 So.2d 696 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (La.1983).

221986–2004
State v. Tully green
la · 1983
2 sentences

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

2003State v. Bradford, supra; State v. Woodman, 28,-004 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/96), 666 So.2d 1255 , writ denied, 96-0489 (La.5/3/96), 672 So.2d 696 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (La.1983).

191986–2004
State v. Woodman green
lactapp · 1996
2 sentences

2008State v. Bradford, supra; State v. Woodman, 28,-004 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/96), 666 So.2d 1255 , writ denied, 96-0489 (La.5/3/96), 672 So.2d 696 .

2008State v. Woodman, 28,004 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/96), 666 So.2d 1255 , writ denied, 96-0489 (La.5/3/96), 672 So.2d 696 .

121997–2008
Woodman v. State green
la · 1996
2 sentences

2008State v. Bradford, supra; State v. Woodman, 28,-004 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/96), 666 So.2d 1255 , writ denied, 96-0489 (La.5/3/96), 672 So.2d 696 .

2008State v. Woodman, 28,004 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/96), 666 So.2d 1255 , writ denied, 96-0489 (La.5/3/96), 672 So.2d 696 .

101997–2008
State v. Bradford neutral
lactapp · 1997
2 sentences

2000State v. Bradford, 29,519 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), 691 So.2d 864 .

1999State v. Bradford, 29,519 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), 691 So.2d 864 .

41998–2000
State v. Benson neutral
lactapp · 2008
1 sentence

2015State v. Benson, 43,150 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/08), 978 So.2d 491 , writ denied, 2008-0814 (La.10/24/08), 992 So.2d 1039 .

12015–2015
State v. Benson green
la · 2008
1 sentence

2015State v. Benson, 43,150 (La.App.2d Cir.2/27/08), 978 So.2d 491 , writ denied, 2008-0814 (La.10/24/08), 992 So.2d 1039 .

12015–2015
State v. Flores green
lactapp · 1996
1 sentence

2008State v. Flores, 27,736 (La.App. 2d Cir.2/28/96), 669 So.2d 646 .

12008–2008
State v. Jones green
lactapp · 2000
1 sentence

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

12004–2004
State v. Callahan green
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

12004–2004
State v. Lott green
la · 1997
1 sentence

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

12004–2004
State v. Hunt neutral
lactapp · 2001
1 sentence

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

12004–2004
State v. Frye neutral
lactapp · 2003
1 sentence

2004State v. Bradford, supra ; State v. Callahan, supra ; State v. Frye, 37,009 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03) 847 So.2d 151 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/9/04), 862 So.2d 979 . *909 The record shows that the defendant's sentences were well below the maximum sentences that could have been imposed.

12004–2004
State v. Pier neutral
la · 2004
1 sentence

2004State v. Bradford, supra ; State v. Callahan, supra ; State v. Frye, 37,009 (La.App.2d Cir.5/14/03) 847 So.2d 151 , writ denied, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/9/04), 862 So.2d 979 . *909 The record shows that the defendant's sentences were well below the maximum sentences that could have been imposed.

12004–2004
State v. Landman neutral
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

2004State v. Jones, 33,111 (La.App. 2 Cir. 3/1/00), 754 So.2d 392 ; State v. Callahan, 29,351 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/26/97), 690 So.2d 864 , writ denied, 97-0705 (La.9/26/97), 701 So.2d 979 . |RAs this court said in State v. Hunt, 34,945 (La.App. 2 Cir. 9/26/01), 797 So.2d 138 , rehearing denied (10/25/01), “The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.” State v. Landman, 29,211 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/22/97), 687 So.2d 652 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2 Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

12004–2004
State v. Cook green
lactapp · 1992
1 sentence

2001State v. Cook, 598 So.2d 481 (La.App. 2d Cir.4/08/92) supra. The judge may consider whatever factors and evidence he deems important to a determination of the best interest of the public and the defendant.

12001–2001
State v. Delaughter green
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

2001State v. Delaughter, 29,974 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/10/97), 703 So.2d 1364 ; writ denied, 98-0018 (La.5/1/98),-So.2d-, 1998 WL 234691 .

12001–2001
State v. Delaughter green
la · 1998
1 sentence

2001State v. Delaughter, 29,974 (La.App.2d Cir. 12/10/97), 703 So.2d 1364 ; writ denied, 98-0018 (La.5/1/98),-So.2d-, 1998 WL 234691 .

12001–2001
State v. Smith neutral
lactapp · 1998
1 sentence

2000State v. Smith, 30,614 (La.App.2d Cir.5/13/98), 713 So.2d 650 .

12000–2000
State v. Shaw neutral
lactapp · 1997
1 sentence

1998State v. Shaw, 29,927 (La.App.2d Cir. 10/29/97), 702 So.2d 5 ; State v. Bradford, 29,519 (La.App.2d Cir. 4/2/97), 691 So.2d 864 .

11998–1998
State v. Strange neutral
lactapp · 1996
1 sentence

1998State v. Strange, 28,466 (La.App.2d Cir. 6/26/96), 677 So.2d 587 ; State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (1983).

11998–1998
State v. Harris neutral
lactapp · 1990
1 sentence

1996State v. Caros, 623 So.2d 207 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v. Harris, 561 So.2d 792 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990).

11996–1996
State v. Caros neutral
lactapp · 1993
1 sentence

1996State v. Caros, 623 So.2d 207 (La.App. 2d Cir.1993); State v. Harris, 561 So.2d 792 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990).

11996–1996
State v. Ester green
lactapp · 1986
1 sentence

1989State v. McKethan, 459 So.2d 72 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); State v. Ester, 490 So.2d 579 (La.App. 2d Cir.1986).

11989–1989
State v. Hawkins green
la · 1986
1 sentence

1988State v. McKethan, 459 So.2d 72 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (La.1983).” State v. Hawkins, 490 So.2d 594 (La.App. 2d Cir.1986), writ denied, 494 So.2d 1174 (La.1986).

11988–1988
State v. Hawkins green
lactapp · 1986
1 sentence

1988State v. McKethan, 459 So.2d 72 (La.App. 2d Cir.1984); State v. Tully, 430 So.2d 124 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied, 435 So.2d 438 (La.1983).” State v. Hawkins, 490 So.2d 594 (La.App. 2d Cir.1986), writ denied, 494 So.2d 1174 (La.1986).

11988–1988

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:967 (7) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:966 (5) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:81 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:438 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 40:964 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check