adea claim in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
King v. Stategreen fladistctapp · 2008 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 2 sentences 2013See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (adopting federal ADEA analysis for age discrimination claim under Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992; stating “[a]ge discrimination statutes protect only employment decisions which disadvantage an older worker in favor of a younger worker”) (citing Gen. 2013See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (adopting federal ADEA analysis for age discrimination claim under Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992; stating “[a]ge discrimination statutes protect only employment decisions which disadvantage an older worker in favor of a younger worker”) (citing Gen.	2	2
Miami-Dade County v. Eghbalgreen fladistctapp · 2011 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 2 sentences 2013Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 , 124 S.Ct. 1236 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). 2013Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 , 124 S.Ct. 1236 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).	2	2
McCollum v. LIEBHERR AMERICA, INC.green fla · 2011 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 2 sentences 2013Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 , 124 S.Ct. 1236 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). 2013Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 , 124 S.Ct. 1236 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).	2	2
Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Scarbroughgreen fla · 1978 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001 2 sentences 2001See Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 1977). 2001See Colonial Stores, Inc. v. Scarbrough, 355 So.2d 1181 (Fla. 1977).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

Case	Cited	Years
General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc. v. Cline green scotus · 2004 2 sentences 2013Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 , 124 S.Ct. 1236 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011). 2013Dynamics Land Sys., Inc. v. Cline, 540 U.S. 581 , 124 S.Ct. 1236 , 157 L.Ed.2d 1094 (2004)); see also Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Eghbal, 54 So.3d 525, 526 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (adopting federal analysis for state age discrimination claim, including the requirement that, to state a prima facie case, plaintiff must prove “the position was filled by a worker who was substantially younger than the plaintiff’), review denied, Miami-Dade County v. Eghbal, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).	2	2013–2013
cluster 19566 green · 1 sentence 2007Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 377 F.3d 1099 , 1100 n. 1 (9th Cir.2004) (Title VII and ADA claims, noting that "[j]ust as there is a ministerial exception to Title VII, there must also be one to any federal or state cause of action that would otherwise impinge on the Church's prerogative to choose its ministers"); Starkman v. Evans, 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir.1999) (applying ministerial exception to ADA and state anti-retaliatory statute claims); Minker v. Baltimore Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 894 F.2d 1354 (D.C.Cir.1990) (applying ministerial exception to ADEA clai	1	2007–2007
Hutchison v. Thomas green ca6 · 1986 1 sentence 2007Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 377 F.3d 1099 , 1100 n. 1 (9th Cir.2004) (Title VII and ADA claims, noting that "[j]ust as there is a ministerial exception to Title VII, there must also be one to any federal or state cause of action that would otherwise impinge on the Church's prerogative to choose its ministers"); Starkman v. Evans, 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir.1999) (applying ministerial exception to ADA and state anti-retaliatory statute claims); Minker v. Baltimore Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 894 F.2d 1354 (D.C.Cir.1990) (applying ministerial exception to ADEA clai	1	2007–2007
Ralph L. Minker v. Baltimore Annual Conference of United Methodist Church and Bishop Joseph A. Yeakel green cadc · 1990 1 sentence 2007Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 377 F.3d 1099 , 1100 n. 1 (9th Cir.2004) (Title VII and ADA claims, noting that "[j]ust as there is a ministerial exception to Title VII, there must also be one to any federal or state cause of action that would otherwise impinge on the Church's prerogative to choose its ministers"); Starkman v. Evans, 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir.1999) (applying ministerial exception to ADA and state anti-retaliatory statute claims); Minker v. Baltimore Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 894 F.2d 1354 (D.C.Cir.1990) (applying ministerial exception to ADEA clai	1	2007–2007
Andrew E. Werft v. Desert Southwest Annual Conference Of The United Methodist Church green ca9 · 2004 1 sentence 2007Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 377 F.3d 1099 , 1100 n. 1 (9th Cir.2004) (Title VII and ADA claims, noting that "[j]ust as there is a ministerial exception to Title VII, there must also be one to any federal or state cause of action that would otherwise impinge on the Church's prerogative to choose its ministers"); Starkman v. Evans, 198 F.3d 173 (5th Cir.1999) (applying ministerial exception to ADA and state anti-retaliatory statute claims); Minker v. Baltimore Annual Conference of United Methodist Church, 894 F.2d 1354 (D.C.Cir.1990) (applying ministerial exception to ADEA clai	1	2007–2007
Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. green scotus · 1991 2 sentences 2004Id. at 23-24 , 155 111 S.Ct. 1647 . 2004Id. at 23-24 , 155 111 S.Ct. 1647 .	1	2004–2004
cluster 697725 green ca8 · 1995 2 sentences 2001Nichols Real Estate, 57 F.3d 662 (8th Cir.1995). [3] First Union does not argue that this evidentiary deficiency was in any way cured at trial and therefore the trial court correctly denied the bank's motion for directed verdict on the statute of limitations issue as it pertains to the ADEA claim. 2001Nichols Real Estate, 57 F.3d 662 (8th Cir.1995). [3] First Union does not argue that this evidentiary deficiency was in any way cured at trial and therefore the trial court correctly denied the bank's motion for directed verdict on the statute of limitations issue as it pertains to the ADEA claim.	1	2001–2001
Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. green fladistctapp · 1987 1 sentence 1993Hullinger v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 516 So.2d 1148 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).	1	1993–1993

Where else courts name it

TX 12 (2000–2025) CA 11 (1990–2021) AL 8 (1986–2025) OH 8 (1990–2024) NJ 7 (1994–2024) FL 6 (1993–2013) CT 6 (1985–1999) MS 5 (1992–2007) MD 4 (2004–2009) IL 4 (2007–2017) MA 3 (1987–1993) OR 3 (2010–2016) TN 3 (1996–2018) NC 3 (2020–2020) LA 3 (1999–2016) WI 3 (1980–2000) NM 2 (1998–1998) VA 2 (1998–2014) PA 2 (2005–2025) MN 2 (2000–2004) WV 2 (1999–2002) CO 2 (1990–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check