adea claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

adea claim in Connecticut

6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1985–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Peter J. Laniok v. Advisory Committee of the Brainerd Manufacturing Company Pension Plangreen
ca2 · 1991 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1997–1999
2 sentences

1999To the contrary, public policy favors voluntary settlement of employment discrimination claims. . . ." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Jeffress v. Yale University, Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven at New Haven, Docket No. 386866 (August 28, 1997, Silbert, J. ); see also Laniok v. Advisory Committee, CT Page 13838 935 F.2d 1360 , 1365 (2d Cir. 1991) (waiver of ADEA claim valid if made knowingly and voluntarily).

1997Co., 65 F.3d 562 (7th Cir. 1995) (release of age and race discrimination claims found valid); Haniok v. Advisory Committee, 935 F.2d 1360 , 1365 (2d Cir. 1991) (waiver of ADEA claim valid if made knowingly and voluntarily) Frumkin v. IBM Corp., 801 F. Sup. 1030 , 1041-44 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (plaintiff validly waived ADEA claim); Carroll v. Primerica Fin.

12
cluster 367144green
ca9 · 1979 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
2 sentences

1994He need only commence the state action, even though that action is subject to dis missal because of the late filing.” (Citation omitted; emphasis added.) Id., 132; see also Bean v. Crocker National Bank, 600 F.2d 754 (9th Cir. 1979); Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc., 719 F. Sup. 149 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

1994He need only commence the state action, even though that action is subject to dis missal because of the late filing.” (Citation omitted; emphasis added.) Id., 132; see also Bean v. Crocker National Bank, 600 F.2d 754 (9th Cir. 1979); Donahue v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc., 719 F. Sup. 149 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).

11
Bess Kennedy v. William H. Whitehurst, Acting Director, Department of Human Servicesgreen
cadc · 1982 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
2 sentences

1985Compare Kennedy v. Whitehurst, 690 F.2d 951, 961 (D.C.

1985Compare Kennedy v. Whitehurst, 690 F.2d 951, 961 (D.C.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Oubre v. Entergy Operations, Inc. green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

1998An employee may not waive' an ADEA claim unless the employer complies with the statute." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Oubre v. Energy Operations, Inc. , 522 U.S. ___ , ___, 118 S.Ct. 838 , 139 L.Ed.2d 849 (1998).

1998An employee may not waive' an ADEA claim unless the employer complies with the statute." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Oubre v. Energy Operations, Inc. , 522 U.S. ___ , ___, 118 S.Ct. 838 , 139 L.Ed.2d 849 (1998).

11998–1998
Eugene Pierce v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., D/B/A Santa Fe Railroad Co., Cross-Appellee green
ca7 · 1995
1 sentence

1997Co., 65 F.3d 562 (7th Cir. 1995) (release of age and race discrimination claims found valid); Haniok v. Advisory Committee, 935 F.2d 1360 , 1365 (2d Cir. 1991) (waiver of ADEA claim valid if made knowingly and voluntarily) Frumkin v. IBM Corp., 801 F. Sup. 1030 , 1041-44 (S.D.N.Y. 1992) (plaintiff validly waived ADEA claim); Carroll v. Primerica Fin.

11997–1997
Carole Tomka v. The Seiler Corporation, Daniel Lucey, David Polonsky and Timothy Conroy green
ca2 · 1995
2 sentences

1996Warren's Personal Liability The defendants next argue that the court should grant summary judgment in its favor 9 as to count two since there can be no personal liability on an ADEA claim, relying on Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295 (2d Cir. 1995).

1996Warren's Personal Liability The defendants next argue that the court should grant summary judgment in its favor 9 as to count two since there can be no personal liability on an ADEA claim, relying on Tomka v. Seiler Corp., 66 F.3d 1295 (2d Cir. 1995).

11996–1996
Sullivan v. Board of Police Commissioners green
conn · 1985
2 sentences

1994No. 805, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. [1967]); cf. Sullivan v. Board of Police Commissioners, 196 Conn. 208 , 491 A.2d 1096 (1985) (dismissing ADEA claim for failure to comply with administrative notice requirements).

1994No. 805, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. [1967]); cf. Sullivan v. Board of Police Commissioners, 196 Conn. 208 , 491 A.2d 1096 (1985) (dismissing ADEA claim for failure to comply with administrative notice requirements).

11994–1994
Cahoon v. Alton Packaging Corp. green
illappct · 1986
1 sentence

1994Cahoon v. Alton Packaging Corp., 148 Ill.

11994–1994
Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans green
scotus · 1979
2 sentences

1985We also note that the plaintiff’s ADEA claim is affected by 29 U.S.C. § 633 (b), which provides: “In the case of an alleged unlawful practice occurring in a State which has a law prohibiting discrimination in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated.” See Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750 , 99 S

1985We also note that the plaintiff’s ADEA claim is affected by 29 U.S.C. § 633 (b), which provides: “In the case of an alleged unlawful practice occurring in a State which has a law prohibiting discrimination in employment because of age and establishing or authorizing a State authority to grant or seek relief from such discriminatory practice, no suit may be brought under section 626 of this title before the expiration of sixty days after proceedings have been commenced under the State law, unless such proceedings have been earlier terminated.” See Oscar Mayer & Co. v. Evans, 441 U.S. 750 , 99 S

11985–1985
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wyoming green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1985He argues further that federal law, which applies both by its terms to his ADEA claim; see 29 U.S.C. §§ 623 , 630, 631; EEOC v. Wyoming, 460 U.S. 226, 234-44 , 103 S. Ct. 1054 , 75 L.

1985He argues further that federal law, which applies both by its terms to his ADEA claim; see 29 U.S.C. §§ 623 , 630, 631; EEOC v. Wyoming, 460 U.S. 226, 234-44 , 103 S. Ct. 1054 , 75 L.

11985–1985
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority green
scotus · 1985
2 sentences

1985Ed. 2d 18 (1983); cf. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. , 105 S. Ct. 1005 , 83 L.

1985Ed. 2d 18 (1983); cf. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. , 105 S. Ct. 1005 , 83 L.

11985–1985

Where else courts name it

TX 12 (2000–2025) CA 11 (1990–2021) AL 8 (1986–2025) OH 8 (1990–2024) NJ 7 (1994–2024) FL 6 (1993–2013) CT 6 (1985–1999) MS 5 (1992–2007) MD 4 (2004–2009) IL 4 (2007–2017) MA 3 (1987–1993) OR 3 (2010–2016) TN 3 (1996–2018) NC 3 (2020–2020) LA 3 (1999–2016) WI 3 (1980–2000) NM 2 (1998–1998) VA 2 (1998–2014) PA 2 (2005–2025) MN 2 (2000–2004) WV 2 (1999–2002) CO 2 (1990–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check