Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1933–1984 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Violet Van Natta Ide v. City of St. Cloudgreen1 sentence1948See Fielding v. Highsmith, 152 Fla. 837 , 13 So. (2nd) 208 . | 1 | 1 |
Fieldiing v. Highsmithgreen1 sentence1948See Fielding v. Highsmith, 152 Fla. 837 , 13 So. (2nd) 208 . | 1 | 1 |
Wolf v. Chicago Sign Printing Co.green2 sentences1933See also the reasoning employed in Wolf v. Printing Co., 233 Ill. 501 , 84 N. E. 614 , where the Supreme Court of Illinois said: “ ‘To say that a request to the court to decide a pure question of law clothes the Court with power to decide controverted questions of fact, would be both illogical and inconsistent with the nature of the motion. * * * When one party asks the Court to direct a verdict in his favor, the fact that the other party makes a similar motion, cannot in any way affect the rights of the first party.’ ” Plaintiff in error contends that the Court below committed reversible erro 1933See also the reasoning employed in Wolf v. Printing Co., 233 Ill. 501 , 84 N. E. 614 , where the Supreme Court of Illinois said: “ ‘To say that a request to the court to decide a pure question of law clothes the Court with power to decide controverted questions of fact, would be both illogical and inconsistent with the nature of the motion. * * * When one party asks the Court to direct a verdict in his favor, the fact that the other party makes a similar motion, cannot in any way affect the rights of the first party.’ ” Plaintiff in error contends that the Court below committed reversible erro | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Rules of Crim. Proc.(sent. Guidelines)
green
1 sentence1984Appellant contends that the court below committed reversible error in refusing to sentence him pursuant to the new sentencing guidelines set forth in Rule 3.701, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, effective October 1, 1983, adopted by opinion In re Rules of Criminal Procedure (Sentencing Guidelines), 439 So.2d 848 (Fla. 1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Thomas v. State
green
1 sentence1979The subsequent developments, in the taking of the testimony, showed that this ruling was not a harmless error." * * * * * * In the more recent case of Thomas v. State, 297 So.2d 850 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974), the court held that a "pretrial motion to sever should have been granted. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Cone v. State
green
1 sentence1967The State so contends in its brief citing Cone v. State, Fla., 69 So.2d 175 . " ” " With that in mind, we feel the court below committed reversible error in permitting the prosecuting attorney to lay an illusory foundation for an imaginary impeachment of the appellant’s testimony. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Harrison v. State
green
2 sentences1935The evidence as to whether or not the confessions were freely and voluntarily made is conflicting, but the trial court, after a full and fair examination of the witnesses in this regard, held the confessions admissible and on authority of the opinion and judgment of this Court in the case of Harrison v. State, 110 Fla. 420 , 148 Sou. 882 , and authorities there cited, we hold that no reversible error is made to appear. 1935The evidence as to whether or not the confessions were freely and voluntarily made is conflicting, but the trial court, after a full and fair examination of the witnesses in this regard, held the confessions admissible and on authority of the opinion and judgment of this Court in the case of Harrison v. State, 110 Fla. 420 , 148 Sou. 882 , and authorities there cited, we hold that no reversible error is made to appear. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.