Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blockburger v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2015Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932); see § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2006) (codifying the Blockburger elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate offenses). 2015Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932); see § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2006) (codifying the Blockburger elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate offenses). | 2 | 3 |
CHRISTOPHER LEON JACOBS v. STATE OF FLORIDAgreen1 sentence2021See Jacobs v. State, 272 So. 3d 838, 840 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019). | 1 | 1 |
Khianthalat v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Ed. 306 (1932); see also Pizzo v. State, 945 So. 2d 1203, 1206 (Fla. 2006) (“A defendant is placed in double jeopardy where based upon the same conduct the defendant is convicted of two offenses, each of which does not require proof of a different element.”); § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2018) (codifying the Blockburger elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate punishments); Khianthalat v. State, 974 So. 2d 359, 361 (Fla. 2008) (“The 2 elements of simple battery are: (1) actually and intentionally touching or striking another person; and (2) against the will of the | 1 | 1 |
Washington v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Ed. 306 (1932); see also Pizzo v. State, 945 So. 2d 1203, 1206 (Fla. 2006) (“A defendant is placed in double jeopardy where based upon the same conduct the defendant is convicted of two offenses, each of which does not require proof of a different element.”); § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2018) (codifying the Blockburger elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate punishments); Khianthalat v. State, 974 So. 2d 359, 361 (Fla. 2008) (“The 2 elements of simple battery are: (1) actually and intentionally touching or striking another person; and (2) against the will of the | 1 | 1 |
Pizzo v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Ed. 306 (1932); see also Pizzo v. State, 945 So. 2d 1203, 1206 (Fla. 2006) (“A defendant is placed in double jeopardy where based upon the same conduct the defendant is convicted of two offenses, each of which does not require proof of a different element.”); § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2018) (codifying the Blockburger elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate punishments); Khianthalat v. State, 974 So. 2d 359, 361 (Fla. 2008) (“The 2 elements of simple battery are: (1) actually and intentionally touching or striking another person; and (2) against the will of the | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Carswell
green
1 sentence2019Ed. 306 (1932); see also Pizzo v. State, 945 So. 2d 1203, 1206 (Fla. 2006) (“A defendant is placed in double jeopardy where based upon the same conduct the defendant is convicted of two offenses, each of which does not require proof of a different element.”); § 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (2018) (codifying the Blockburger elements test where the Legislature does not clearly provide for separate punishments); Khianthalat v. State, 974 So. 2d 359, 361 (Fla. 2008) (“The 2 elements of simple battery are: (1) actually and intentionally touching or striking another person; and (2) against the will of the | 1 | 2019–2019 |
United States v. Dixon
green
2 sentences2011The Court held, “Applying the Blockburger elements test, the result is clear: These crimes were different offenses, and the subsequent prosecution did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.” 509 U.S. at 701-02 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 . 2011The Court held, “Applying the Blockburger elements test, the result is clear: These crimes were different offenses, and the subsequent prosecution did not violate the Double Jeopardy Clause.” 509 U.S. at 701-02 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.