Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2017–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ronald Pak Zern v. State of Floridagreen2 sentences2019This right cannot be waived, and a trial court's failure to make such a finding constitutes fundamental error." (citation omitted) (citing Zern v. State, 191 So. 3d 962, 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016))). 2018“This right cannot be waived, and a trial court’s failure to make such a finding constitutes fundamental error.” Id. (citing Zern, 191 So.3d at 965 ). | 2 | 5 |
Bernard J. Dougherty v. State of Floridagreen1 sentence2019"Generally, the remedy for a trial court's failure to conduct a proper competency hearing is for the defendant to receive a new trial, if deemed competent to proceed on remand." Dougherty v. State, 149 So. 3d 672, 678-79 (Fla. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Golloman v. State
green
2 sentences2020“This right cannot be waived, and a trial court’s failure to make such a finding constitutes fundamental error.” Id. 2018"This right cannot be waived, and a trial court's failure to make such a finding constitutes fundamental error." Id. (quoting Golloman , 226 So.3d at 335 , which in turn cited to Zern v. State , 191 So.3d 962 , 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ). | 3 | 2018–2020 |