Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Yardley v. Albugreen2 sentences2023“However, when the party against whom a preliminary injunction is entered does not file a motion to dissolve the injunction pursuant to rule 1.610(d) prior to the direct appeal, the appellate court may not inquire into the factual matters presented . . . .” Yardley v. Albu, 826 So. 2d 467, 469 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). “[I]nstead, the court’s inquiry is limited to the legal sufficiency of the trial court’s order, the complaint, and any supporting documents.” Id. 2023“However, when the party against whom a preliminary injunction is entered does not file a motion to dissolve the injunction pursuant to rule 1.610(d) prior to the direct appeal, the appellate court may not inquire into the factual matters presented . . . .” Yardley v. Albu, 826 So. 2d 467, 469 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). “[I]nstead, the court’s inquiry is limited to the legal sufficiency of the trial court’s order, the complaint, and any supporting documents.” Id. | 3 | 4 |
Dickerson v. Senior Home Care, Inc.green1 sentence2023In order to receive a temporary injunction, the moving party must establish: “(1) the likelihood of irreparable harm; (2) the lack 3 of an adequate remedy at law; (3) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) considerations of the public interest.” Dickerson v. Senior Home Care, Inc., 181 So. 3d 1228, 1229 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) (citing Yardley, 826 So. 2d at 470 ). | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. OSLER MEDICAL, INC.green1 sentence2007Thomas, 963 So.2d at 900 (emphasis added) (citations omitted). [3] In reasoning to this result, Judge Sawaya generously recognized and confessed to error in his own prior opinion, Yardley v. Albu, 826 So.2d 467, 469 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002), where he wrote in another appeal of an injunction entered after notice and hearing: when the party against whom a preliminary injunction is entered does not file a motion to dissolve the injunction pursuant to rule 1.610(d) prior to the direct appeal, the appellate court may not inquire into the factual matters presented; instead the court's inquiry is limited | 1 | 1 |
Stanfield v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAM.green1 sentence1999See Stanfield v. Florida Dep't of Child. & Fam., 698 So.2d 321, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Reiter v. Mason, 563 So.2d 749 , 750 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). [2] The advertisement read as follows: Attorney Spencer Aronfeld is seeking interviews with any woman between the ages of 18-40 who saw Dermatologist Dr. Feinstein and received any medication from him. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rodriguez Ex Rel. Rodriguez v. Feinstein
green
1 sentence2010Posso-Rodriguez v. Feinstein, 734 So.2d 1162 , 1163 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (citations omitted). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Reiter v. Mason
green
1 sentence1999See Stanfield v. Florida Dep't of Child. & Fam., 698 So.2d 321, 322 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); Reiter v. Mason, 563 So.2d 749 , 750 n. 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). [2] The advertisement read as follows: Attorney Spencer Aronfeld is seeking interviews with any woman between the ages of 18-40 who saw Dermatologist Dr. Feinstein and received any medication from him. | 1 | 1999–1999 |