Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wilson v. Arkansasgreen2 sentences2010The Supreme Court also explained that it concluded in Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995), that the knock- and-announce rule is also a command of the Fourth Amendment — in essence, the common law knock-and-announce rule is part of the reasonableness inquiry under the Fourth Amendment. 2010The Supreme Court also explained that it concluded in Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995), that the knock- and-announce rule is also a command of the Fourth Amendment — in essence, the common law knock-and-announce rule is part of the reasonableness inquiry under the Fourth Amendment. | 2 | 5 |
Sabbath v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2007See Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585 , 591 n. 8, 88 S.Ct. 1755 , 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) (holding that the exceptions to the common law knock-and-announce rule also applied to 18 U.S.C. § 3109 "since they existed at common law, of which the statute is a codification"). 2007See Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585 , 591 n. 8, 88 S.Ct. 1755 , 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968) (holding that the exceptions to the common law knock-and-announce rule also applied to 18 U.S.C. § 3109 "since they existed at common law, of which the statute is a codification"). | 1 | 1 |
Hernandez v. Stategreen1 sentence2007See Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927, 934 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995) (holding that the common law knock-and-announce principle forms a part of the Fourth Amendment reasonableness inquiry); see also Hernandez v. State, 863 So.2d 484, 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (noting that the Supreme Court in Banks had held that a fifteen-to twenty-second wait before forcible entry "satisfied both the Fourth *1032 Amendment and 18 U.S.C. 3109, which is almost identical to section 933.09"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
New Jersey v. T. L. O.
green
2 sentences2010Indeed, Benefield applied the exclusionary rule for violations of the knock-and-announce statute long before the United States Supreme Court decided in Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995), that the common law knock-and-announce rule was also a “ ‘command of the Fourth Amendment.’” Id. at 931 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 (quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 337 , 105 S.Ct. 733 , 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985)). 2010Indeed, Benefield applied the exclusionary rule for violations of the knock-and-announce statute long before the United States Supreme Court decided in Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995), that the common law knock-and-announce rule was also a “ ‘command of the Fourth Amendment.’” Id. at 931 , 115 S.Ct. 1914 (quoting New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 337 , 105 S.Ct. 733 , 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985)). | 2 | 2009–2010 |
Hudson v. Michigan
green
2 sentences2010The Supreme Court concluded that the common law knock-and-announce violation in that case was, without more, insufficient to support the "massive remedy of suppressing evidence of guilt.” 547 U.S. at 599 , 126 S.Ct. 2159 . 2 . 2010The Supreme Court concluded that the common law knock-and-announce violation in that case was, without more, insufficient to support the "massive remedy of suppressing evidence of guilt.” 547 U.S. at 599 , 126 S.Ct. 2159 . 2 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Cable v. State
green
1 sentence2010Cable, 18 So.3d at 39 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.