Michigan rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

Michigan rule in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Killebrewgreen
mich · 1983 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000Consistent with Davis , we do not proscribe judicial participation in the plea bargaining process; however, judicial involvement must be limited "to minimize the potential coercive effect on the defendant, to retain the function of the judge as a neutral arbiter, and to preserve the public perception of the judge as an impartial dispenser of justice." Cobbs, 505 N.W.2d at 212 (quoting People v. Killebrew, 416 Mich. 189 , 330 N.W.2d 834, 839 (1982)).

2000Consistent with Davis , we do not proscribe judicial participation in the plea bargaining process; however, judicial involvement must be limited "to minimize the potential coercive effect on the defendant, to retain the function of the judge as a neutral arbiter, and to preserve the public perception of the judge as an impartial dispenser of justice." Cobbs, 505 N.W.2d at 212 (quoting People v. Killebrew, 416 Mich. 189 , 330 N.W.2d 834, 839 (1982)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Lane green
michctapp · 2014
2 sentences

2020Id. at 457-48 .

2020Id. at 457-48 .

22020–2020
Sutton v. Smith green
fladistctapp · 1992
1 sentence

2021Id. at 694 .

12021–2021
Dore v. Roten green
fladistctapp · 2005
1 sentence

2005We have explained this reason in a companion case, Dore v. Roten, 911 So.2d 218 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

12005–2005
People v. Cobbs green
mich · 1993
2 sentences

2000Consistent with Davis , we do not proscribe judicial participation in the plea bargaining process; however, judicial involvement must be limited "to minimize the potential coercive effect on the defendant, to retain the function of the judge as a neutral arbiter, and to preserve the public perception of the judge as an impartial dispenser of justice." Cobbs, 505 N.W.2d at 212 (quoting People v. Killebrew, 416 Mich. 189 , 330 N.W.2d 834, 839 (1982)).

2000Consistent with Davis , we do not proscribe judicial participation in the plea bargaining process; however, judicial involvement must be limited "to minimize the potential coercive effect on the defendant, to retain the function of the judge as a neutral arbiter, and to preserve the public perception of the judge as an impartial dispenser of justice." Cobbs, 505 N.W.2d at 212 (quoting People v. Killebrew, 416 Mich. 189 , 330 N.W.2d 834, 839 (1982)).

12000–2000
Mock v. City of Detroit neutral
michctapp · 1978
2 sentences

1986Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc., 144 So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Mock v. City of Detroit, 81 Mich.App. 556 , 265 N.W.2d 416 (1978) (construing a Michigan rule similar to the pre-1972 Florida rule).

1986Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc., 144 So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Mock v. City of Detroit, 81 Mich.App. 556 , 265 N.W.2d 416 (1978) (construing a Michigan rule similar to the pre-1972 Florida rule).

11986–1986
Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc. neutral
fladistctapp · 1962
2 sentences

1986Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc., 144 So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Mock v. City of Detroit, 81 Mich.App. 556 , 265 N.W.2d 416 (1978) (construing a Michigan rule similar to the pre-1972 Florida rule).

1986Cacace v. Associated Technicians, Inc., 144 So.2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); Mock v. City of Detroit, 81 Mich.App. 556 , 265 N.W.2d 416 (1978) (construing a Michigan rule similar to the pre-1972 Florida rule).

11986–1986

Where else courts name it

MI 295 (1888–2026) IL 14 (1911–2021) CA 9 (1955–2021) MN 7 (1906–1997) WI 6 (1927–2004) FL 6 (1986–2021) PA 6 (1959–2019) NE 6 (1928–2018) NJ 5 (1976–2024) UT 5 (1951–2025) MD 5 (1970–2017) MS 5 (1988–2009) IN 5 (1895–2015) OR 4 (1903–1993) AZ 4 (1972–2015) ID 3 (1928–1989) NY 3 (1981–2011) CO 3 (1923–1999) IA 3 (1933–1979) DC 2 (1981–1997) HI 2 (1982–2002) TX 2 (2016–2025) SD 2 (1975–1978) ME 2 (1924–1999) WV 2 (1894–2012) RI 2 (1956–1971) MO 2 (1977–2001) OK 2 (1912–1931) WA 2 (1935–2024) KY 2 (1945–1948) TN 2 (2017–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check