6 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1927–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Greengreen2 sentences2004By the Court. — Order affirmed. 1 Attorney Bridget Boyle-Saxton also participated in Maloney's defense, although it is not necessary for us to discuss the attorneys' activities separately. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes and the Supreme Court Rules are to the 1997-98 version unless otherwise noted. 3 This is sometimes referred to as the Michigan rule, based on Michigan v. Green, 274 N.W.2d 448, 454 (Mich. 1979): The provisions of the code are not constitutional or statutory rights guaranteed to individual persons. 2004By the Court. — Order affirmed. 1 Attorney Bridget Boyle-Saxton also participated in Maloney's defense, although it is not necessary for us to discuss the attorneys' activities separately. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes and the Supreme Court Rules are to the 1997-98 version unless otherwise noted. 3 This is sometimes referred to as the Michigan rule, based on Michigan v. Green, 274 N.W.2d 448, 454 (Mich. 1979): The provisions of the code are not constitutional or statutory rights guaranteed to individual persons. | 1 | 1 |
Hofflander v. St. Catherine's Hospital, Inc.green2 sentences2003See Hofflander, 247 Wis. 2d 636, ¶¶ 29-30 . 2003See Hofflander, 247 Wis. 2d 636, ¶¶ 29-30 . | 1 | 1 |
Hetzel v. Clarkingreen2 sentences1995In Hetzel v. Clarkin, 772 P.2d 800, 805 (Kan. 1989), the Kansas Supreme Court rejected the Michigan approach because it "may lead to collusive settlements between the injured plaintiff and the plaintiffs uninsured motorist insurer. 1995In Hetzel v. Clarkin, 772 P.2d 800, 805 (Kan. 1989), the Kansas Supreme Court rejected the Michigan approach because it "may lead to collusive settlements between the injured plaintiff and the plaintiffs uninsured motorist insurer. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Degraffenreidgreen2 sentences1972As an alternative to that test, he suggests that this court adopt the Michigan standard, as set forth in People v. Armstrong (1970), 28 Mich. App. 387, 391 , 184 N. W. 2d 531 : “An accused is denied effective assistance of counsel, ‘only when the trial was a farce, or a mockery of justice, or was shocking to the conscience of the reviewing court, or the purported representation was only perfunctory, in bad faith, a sham, a pretense, or without adequate opportunity for conference and preparation.’ People v. Degraffenreid (1969), 19 Mich. App. 702, 710 [ 173 N. W. 2d 317, 321 ]. 1972As an alternative to that test, he suggests that this court adopt the Michigan standard, as set forth in People v. Armstrong (1970), 28 Mich. App. 387, 391 , 184 N. W. 2d 531 : “An accused is denied effective assistance of counsel, ‘only when the trial was a farce, or a mockery of justice, or was shocking to the conscience of the reviewing court, or the purported representation was only perfunctory, in bad faith, a sham, a pretense, or without adequate opportunity for conference and preparation.’ People v. Degraffenreid (1969), 19 Mich. App. 702, 710 [ 173 N. W. 2d 317, 321 ]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Frazier v. Heebe
green
2 sentences1993He could cite only Frazier v. Heebe, 482 U.S. 641 (1987) for his assertion that the Michigan rule would be held unconstitutional if the issue were presented in the appropriate forum. 1993He could cite only Frazier v. Heebe, 482 U.S. 641 (1987) for his assertion that the Michigan rule would be held unconstitutional if the issue were presented in the appropriate forum. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
People v. Armstrong
neutral
2 sentences1972As an alternative to that test, he suggests that this court adopt the Michigan standard, as set forth in People v. Armstrong (1970), 28 Mich. App. 387, 391 , 184 N. W. 2d 531 : “An accused is denied effective assistance of counsel, ‘only when the trial was a farce, or a mockery of justice, or was shocking to the conscience of the reviewing court, or the purported representation was only perfunctory, in bad faith, a sham, a pretense, or without adequate opportunity for conference and preparation.’ People v. Degraffenreid (1969), 19 Mich. App. 702, 710 [ 173 N. W. 2d 317, 321 ]. 1972As an alternative to that test, he suggests that this court adopt the Michigan standard, as set forth in People v. Armstrong (1970), 28 Mich. App. 387, 391 , 184 N. W. 2d 531 : “An accused is denied effective assistance of counsel, ‘only when the trial was a farce, or a mockery of justice, or was shocking to the conscience of the reviewing court, or the purported representation was only perfunctory, in bad faith, a sham, a pretense, or without adequate opportunity for conference and preparation.’ People v. Degraffenreid (1969), 19 Mich. App. 702, 710 [ 173 N. W. 2d 317, 321 ]. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Peck v. National Liberty Insurance
green
2 sentences1927Co. 224 Mich. 385, 386 , 194 N. W. 973, 974 . 1927Co. 224 Mich. 385, 386 , 194 N. W. 973, 974 . | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.