motion for writ error (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

motion for writ error in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1964–1997 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Scott v. Wainwrightgreen
fla · 1983 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
1 sentence

1993See Scott v. Wainwright, 433 So.2d 974 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
Medina v. State green
fla · 1997
1 sentence

1997In Medina v. State, 690 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 1997), a majority of this Court recently declined to revisit the Court's decision in Jackson .

11997–1997
Jackson v. State green
fla · 1984
1 sentence

1997In holding that a defendant is not entitled to a judicial determination of his competence to assist counsel in seeking postconviction relief, this Court explained in Jackson : [T]he designation of the criminal procedure rule [3.850] is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature, rather than criminal, and is likened to a combination of the common-law writ of habeas corpus and a motion for writ of error coram nobis. 452 So.2d at 537 .

11997–1997
Preston v. State green
fla · 1988
1 sentence

1988Id. at 898 .

11988–1988
Dykes v. State green
fladistctapp · 1964
1 sentence

1984Dykes v. State, 162 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964).

11984–1984
Falagon v. State neutral
fladistctapp · 1964
1 sentence

1966Although the reason for dismissal of the motion for writ of error coram nobis was not set forth in the order, it was represented to this court that the Hills-borough court considered coram nobis was not available, under the decisions of the second district court of appeal in Falagon v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 62 , and Grant v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 503 .

11966–1966
Grant v. State green
fladistctapp · 1964
1 sentence

1966Although the reason for dismissal of the motion for writ of error coram nobis was not set forth in the order, it was represented to this court that the Hills-borough court considered coram nobis was not available, under the decisions of the second district court of appeal in Falagon v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 62 , and Grant v. State, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 503 .

11966–1966
Bistram v. United States green
ndd · 1960
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
United States v. Raymond S. Mathison green
ca7 · 1958
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Johnson v. Zerbst green
scotus · 1938
2 sentences

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Sanders v. United States green
scotus · 1963
2 sentences

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Carl Harvey Bistram v. United States neutral
ca8 · 1960
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Sypniewski v. Buchkoe green
scotus · 1958
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Graeber v. Rhay green
scotus · 1958
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Smith v. Rhay green
scotus · 1958
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Mathews v. Colorado green
scotus · 1961
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964
Kesel v. Reid green
scotus · 1961
1 sentence

1964Wis. 1958), affirmed 256 F.2d 803 , certiorari denied, 358 U.S. 857 , 79 S.Ct. 77 , 3 L.Ed.2d 91 ; Bistram v. U.S., 180 F. Supp. 501 (D.C.N.D. 1960), affirmed 283 F.2d 1 , certiorari denied 366 U.S. 921 , 81 S.Ct. 1096 , 6 L.Ed.2d 243 . [4] Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 , 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938). [5] Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1 , 83 S.Ct. 1068 , 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1962). [6] It might be noted that the designation of this rule is a misnomer in that the proceeding is civil in nature rather than criminal and is likened to a combination of the common law writ of habeas corpus

11964–1964

Where else courts name it

FL 6 (1964–1997) NE 4 (1993–2020) IL 2 (1946–1947) MO 2 (1978–1979) MS 2 (1991–2011)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check