Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tucker v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Companygreen1 sentence2007See Tucker v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 552 So.2d 1178, 1179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Pinellas Cty. v. Florida Public Emp.green1 sentence1982Compare Pinellas County v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 379 So.2d 985 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (reversal justified where a time violation for which no extenuating circumstances existed adversely affected the fairness of the proceedings and constituted a material error in procedure) with School Board of Sarasota County v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 382 So.2d 1361 , 1362 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (reversal not justified on grounds of a time violation where extenuating circumstances existed and no severe prejudice was shown). | 1 | 1 |
School Board of Sarasota County v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commissiongreen1 sentence1982Compare Pinellas County v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 379 So.2d 985 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (reversal justified where a time violation for which no extenuating circumstances existed adversely affected the fairness of the proceedings and constituted a material error in procedure) with School Board of Sarasota County v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 382 So.2d 1361 , 1362 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) (reversal not justified on grounds of a time violation where extenuating circumstances existed and no severe prejudice was shown). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DeMario v. Franklin Mortg. & Inv. Co.
green
2 sentences2015Id. 2015Id. | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Pasco Cty. Sch. Bd. v. Florida Public Emp. Rel. Comm.
green
1 sentence1978While agreeing that the challenged order is no model, we are nevertheless persuaded that under the rationale of Pasco County School Board v. Florida Public Employees Relations Commission, 353 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) it is sufficient. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.