Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herring v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2009See Herring v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 695, 702 , 172 L.Ed.2d 496 (2009) (“To trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it.... [E]xclusionary rule serves to deter deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct, or in some circumstances recurring or systemic negligence”). 2009See Herring v. United States, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 695, 702 , 172 L.Ed.2d 496 (2009) (“To trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it.... [E]xclusionary rule serves to deter deliberate, reckless, or grossly negligent conduct, or in some circumstances recurring or systemic negligence”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Berniegreen1 sentence1986Bernie, 472 So.2d at 1247 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Leon
green
2 sentences2009Id. (exclusionary rule applicable "only in those unusual cases in which exclusion will further the purposes of the exclusionary rule"). 2009Id. (exclusionary rule applicable “only in those unusual cases in which exclusion will further the purposes of the exclusionary rule”). | 2 | 2008–2009 |
United States v. Melvin Skinner
green
2 sentences2014Id. - 26 - data from his cell phone. 2014Id. . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Tamer v. State
green
1 sentence1985See United States v. Leon ; Massachusetts v. Sheppard ; United States v. Janis ; Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Brown v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1979Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 608-609 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (Powell, J., concurring). 1979Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 608-609 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (Powell, J., concurring). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.