required Richardson hearing (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

required Richardson hearing in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Flores v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2004 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
2 sentences

2023Harmless error analysis applies to a trial court’s failure to conduct a Richardson hearing following a possible discovery violation. “[T]he failure to conduct an adequate Richardson hearing can be harmless, but ‘[o]nly if the appellate court can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defense was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation.’” Flores v. State, 872 So. 2d 441, 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citation omitted).

2023Harmless error analysis applies to a trial court’s failure to conduct a Richardson hearing following a possible discovery violation. “[T]he failure to conduct an adequate Richardson hearing can be harmless, but ‘[o]nly if the appellate court can say, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defense was not procedurally prejudiced by the discovery violation.’” Flores v. 4 State, 872 So. 2d 441, 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004) (citation omitted).

22
State v. Eatongreen
fladistctapp · 2004 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See State v. Eaton, 868 So.2d 650, 653 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

2008See State v. Eaton, 868 So.2d 650, 653 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

22
M.H. v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2014 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015See, e.g., M.H. v. State, 151 So.3d 32, 37 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Jaime Deandre Brown v. State of Florida green
fladistctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2023“The trial court’s failure to conduct a required Richardson hearing is not reversible error per se.” Brown, 165 So. 3d at 729 .

2023“The trial court’s failure to conduct a required Richardson hearing is not reversible error per se.” Brown, 165 So. 3d at 729 .

32023–2025

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check