Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Instruction 14.2green1 sentence2014In In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases — Instruction 14.2, 121 So.3d 520, 523 (Fla.2013), the supreme court authorized the use of the following revision to the standard instruction in light of Williams v. State, 121 So.3d 524 (Fla.2013): If you find that both theft and dealing in stolen property were proven by the State, and the offenses were in connection with one scheme or course of conduct, then the defendant must be convicted of either theft or dealing in stolen property. | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Stategreen1 sentence1993See Jones v. State, 615 So.2d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Fretwell v. State, 586 So.2d 483 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (declining to apply the revision to rule 3.701 retroactively). | 1 | 1 |
Mesa Petroleum Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.green1 sentence1983See also Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 252, 265 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419, 434 (1981), reh. denied, 455 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1296 , 71 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. O'Cheskeygreen1 sentence1983See also Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 252, 265 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419, 434 (1981), reh. denied, 455 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1296 , 71 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Salama v. Virginiagreen1 sentence1983See also Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 252, 265 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419, 434 (1981), reh. denied, 455 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1296 , 71 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reynogreen2 sentences1983See also Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 252, 265 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419, 434 (1981), reh. denied, 455 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1296 , 71 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). 1983See also Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 252 , 102 S.Ct. 252, 265 , 70 L.Ed.2d 419, 434 (1981), reh. denied, 455 U.S. 928 , 102 S.Ct. 1296 , 71 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brackin v. Brackin
green
2 sentences1968In the meantime, following Brackin v. Brackin, supra, our decision in this case will apply similarly as contemplated in the indicated rule revision.” See also Lyons v. Lyons, Fla.App.3d 1967, 200 So.2d 817 ; Hines v. Hines, Fla.App.1st 1966, 184 So.2d 510 ; and Hartley v. Hartley, Fla.App.2d 1961, 134 So.2d 281 . 1967In the meantime, following Brackin v. Brackin, supra, our decision in this case will apply similarly as contemplated in the indicated rule revision.” It is apparent from Brackin v. Brackin, and Blue v. Blue, that the Supreme Court interpreted Rule 3.8, subd. b, F.A.R., as permitting an appeal from an alimony award when alimony payments had been accepted during the pendency of the appeal. | 3 | 1966–1968 |
Williams v. State
green
1 sentence2014In In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases — Instruction 14.2, 121 So.3d 520, 523 (Fla.2013), the supreme court authorized the use of the following revision to the standard instruction in light of Williams v. State, 121 So.3d 524 (Fla.2013): If you find that both theft and dealing in stolen property were proven by the State, and the offenses were in connection with one scheme or course of conduct, then the defendant must be convicted of either theft or dealing in stolen property. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Fretwell v. State
green
1 sentence1993See Jones v. State, 615 So.2d 705 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Fretwell v. State, 586 So.2d 483 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991) (declining to apply the revision to rule 3.701 retroactively). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Johnson
green
1 sentence1993We take the supreme court's language in State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1993), that resentencing was to occur "in accordance with the valid laws in effect at the time of Johnson's sentencing" to mean that a valid sentencing law was in effect measured by the moment when the crime was committed. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Michaels v. Southard
green
1 sentence1968In the meantime, following Brackin v. Brackin, supra, our decision in this case will apply similarly as contemplated in the indicated rule revision.” See also Lyons v. Lyons, Fla.App.3d 1967, 200 So.2d 817 ; Hines v. Hines, Fla.App.1st 1966, 184 So.2d 510 ; and Hartley v. Hartley, Fla.App.2d 1961, 134 So.2d 281 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Hartley v. Hartley
green
1 sentence1968In the meantime, following Brackin v. Brackin, supra, our decision in this case will apply similarly as contemplated in the indicated rule revision.” See also Lyons v. Lyons, Fla.App.3d 1967, 200 So.2d 817 ; Hines v. Hines, Fla.App.1st 1966, 184 So.2d 510 ; and Hartley v. Hartley, Fla.App.2d 1961, 134 So.2d 281 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Lyons v. Lyons
neutral
1 sentence1968In the meantime, following Brackin v. Brackin, supra, our decision in this case will apply similarly as contemplated in the indicated rule revision.” See also Lyons v. Lyons, Fla.App.3d 1967, 200 So.2d 817 ; Hines v. Hines, Fla.App.1st 1966, 184 So.2d 510 ; and Hartley v. Hartley, Fla.App.2d 1961, 134 So.2d 281 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.