right to counsel warning in Florida

6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
Miranda v. Arizonagreen scotus · 1966 · cited in 3 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2007–2009 2 sentences 2007The long-given warning had recently been augmented by reference to the “ ‘right to free counsel’ ” as well as a “ ‘broaden[ing][of] the right to counsel warning to read counsel of [the defendant’s] own choice.’ ” Id. at 484-85 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 . 2007The long-given warning had recently been augmented by reference to the “ ‘right to free counsel’ ” as well as a “ ‘broaden[ing][of] the right to counsel warning to read counsel of [the defendant’s] own choice.’ ” Id. at 484-85 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 .	1	3
Caso v. Stategreen fla · 1988 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009See, e.g., Mansfield, 758 So.2d at 644 (“The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis.” (quoting Caso, 524 So.2d at 425 )); Alvord v. Dugger, 541 So.2d 598, 600-01 (Fla.1989) (substantially similar). 2009The Admission of the Taped Portion of Rigterink's Interrogation Constituted Harmful Error Despite our holdings above that (i) Rigterink was in custody during the videotaped portion of his interrogation and (ii) the right-to-counsel warning was materially deficient, the erroneous admission of the videotaped confession during Rigterink's trial remains subject to harmless-error review. *255 See, e.g., Mansfield, 758 So.2d at 644 ("The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis." (quoting Caso, 524 So.2d at 425 )); Alvord v. Dugg	1	1
State v. DiGuiliogreen fla · 1986 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 1 sentence 2009To affirm a conviction despite error at trial, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the error "did not contribute to the verdict or, alternatively stated, that there is no reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the conviction." State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1135 (Fla. 1986).	1	1
Mansfield v. Stategreen fla · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009See, e.g., Mansfield, 758 So.2d at 644 (“The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis.” (quoting Caso, 524 So.2d at 425 )); Alvord v. Dugger, 541 So.2d 598, 600-01 (Fla.1989) (substantially similar). 2009The Admission of the Taped Portion of Rigterink's Interrogation Constituted Harmful Error Despite our holdings above that (i) Rigterink was in custody during the videotaped portion of his interrogation and (ii) the right-to-counsel warning was materially deficient, the erroneous admission of the videotaped confession during Rigterink's trial remains subject to harmless-error review. *255 See, e.g., Mansfield, 758 So.2d at 644 ("The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis." (quoting Caso, 524 So.2d at 425 )); Alvord v. Dugg	1	1
California v. Prysockgreen scotus · 1981 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009See Prysock, 453 U.S. at 361 , 101 S.Ct. 2806 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444, 466, 470, 479 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; Powell, 998 So.2d at 540-541 . 2009See Prysock, 453 U.S. at 361 , 101 S.Ct. 2806 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444, 466, 470, 479 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; Powell, 998 So.2d at 540-541 .	1	1
Alvord v. Duggergreen fla · 1989 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009See, e.g., Mansfield, 758 So.2d at 644 (“The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis.” (quoting Caso, 524 So.2d at 425 )); Alvord v. Dugger, 541 So.2d 598, 600-01 (Fla.1989) (substantially similar). 2009The Admission of the Taped Portion of Rigterink's Interrogation Constituted Harmful Error Despite our holdings above that (i) Rigterink was in custody during the videotaped portion of his interrogation and (ii) the right-to-counsel warning was materially deficient, the erroneous admission of the videotaped confession during Rigterink's trial remains subject to harmless-error review. *255 See, e.g., Mansfield, 758 So.2d at 644 ("The erroneous admission of statements obtained in violation of Miranda rights is subject to harmless error analysis." (quoting Caso, 524 So.2d at 425 )); Alvord v. Dugg	1	1
Frank v. United Statesgreen scotus · 1969 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1970–1970 2 sentences 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966). 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Rigterink v. State green fla · 2011 1 sentence 2017Id.	1	2017–2017
State v. Powell green fla · 2008 2 sentences 2009See Prysock, 453 U.S. at 361 , 101 S.Ct. 2806 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444, 466, 470, 479 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; Powell, 998 So.2d at 540-541 . 2009See Prysock, 453 U.S. at 361 , 101 S.Ct. 2806 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444, 466, 470, 479 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; Powell, 998 So.2d at 540-541 .	1	2009–2009
Gideon v. Wainwright green scotus · 1963 2 sentences 1976Appellant alleges that other convictions, obtained of him prior to the right to counsel rule set forth in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), were considered by the trial court in the case sub judice to enhance his sentence. 1976Appellant alleges that other convictions, obtained of him prior to the right to counsel rule set forth in Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963), were considered by the trial court in the case sub judice to enhance his sentence.	1	1976–1976
Cheff v. Schnackenberg green scotus · 1966 2 sentences 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966). 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966).	1	1970–1970
Bloom v. Illinois green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966). 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966).	1	1970–1970
Duncan v. Louisiana green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966). 1970See Frank v. United States, 395 U.S. 147 , 89 S.Ct. 1503 , 23 L.Ed.2d 162 (1969); Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 , 88 S.Ct. 1444 , 20 L.Ed.2d 491 (1968); Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194 , 88 S.Ct. 1477 , 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968); and Cheff v. Schnackenberg, 384 U.S. 373 , 86 S.Ct. 1523 , 16 L.Ed.2d 629 (1966).	1	1970–1970

Where else courts name it

NY 54 (1967–2026) OR 17 (1986–2016) TX 13 (1968–2023) MN 12 (1991–2018) MD 7 (1967–1991) FL 6 (1970–2017) CT 6 (1985–2017) IA 5 (1984–2020) LA 5 (1991–2006) GA 5 (1966–2023) WA 5 (1970–2011) CA 5 (1971–2024) OH 5 (1975–2020) PA 4 (1972–2023) NJ 4 (1996–2022) ME 3 (1970–2004) AZ 3 (1971–2021) CO 2 (1983–2004) IL 2 (1973–1986) RI 2 (2002–2008) TN 2 (1986–2006) KS 2 (2008–2024) NV 2 (1965–2000) IN 2 (1970–1987) NC 2 (2022–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check