5 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge Martinezgreen1 sentence1984The leading case espousing this view is United States v. Alvarez, 519 F.2d 1036, 1045-46 (3rd Cir.1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chrisco v. Shafran
green
2 sentences2016On the facts, however, the court declined to find a right-to-counsel violation because the events leading up to Chrisco’s statements were “not true plea negotiations.” Id. 2016On the facts, however, the court declined to find a right-to-counsel violation because the events leading up to Chrisco’s statements were “not true plea negotiations.” Id. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
Michael Jefferson v. Iowa District Court for Scott County
green
1 sentence2020While Jefferson recognized a right to counsel under rule 2.28(1), it also acknowledged “serious constitutional problems” could result from denying indigent defenders counsel during a motion to correct an illegal sentence. 926 N.W.2d at 524–25. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.