Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1965–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Brunsgreen1 sentence2017Co. v. Bruns, 443 So.2d 959, 961 (Fla.1984) (“The thrust of rule 9.130 is to restrict the number of appealable nonfinal orders.”) The relevant subdivision of rule 9.130 authorizes an appeal from a nonfinal order which determines that a party, as a matter of law, is not entitled to sovereign immunity, or is not entitled to immunity under section 768.28(9). | 1 | 1 |
Pezzo v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Pezzo v. State, 903 So.2d 960, 962 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). 8 Upon our review of the record, we hold that there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determination that the State’s actions were intended to avoid the intent and effect of the speedy trial rule. | 1 | 1 |
Amendments To Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993green1 sentence2002See id. at 1220-21 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Gainesgreen1 sentence2002In response to the Court’s request in State v. Gaines, 770 So.2d 1221, 1228-29 (Fla.2000), the Rules Committee has added the following committee note to rule 3.190, Pretrial Motions: If the trial court exercises its discretion to consider the motion to suppress during trial, the court may withhold ruling on the merits of the motion, and motion for a judgment of acquittal, and allow the case to be submitted to the jury. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, & 3.993
green
1 sentence2000Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.851, 3.852, and 3.993, 772 So.2d 512 (Fla.2000)(published order). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Crews v. Woods
neutral
1 sentence1965However, it added to the seemingly unrelated sentence concerning dismissals not expressly provided for in the subdivision governing involuntary dismissals the following qualification: "[E]xcept, however, that nothing stated herein shall preclude a non-suit from being taken pursuant to any applicable statute." The purpose and effect of this exception was described as follows in Crews v. Woods, Fla. 1952, 59 So.2d 526 : "Rule 35 of the new Florida Common Law Rules deals with the dismissal of actions and is identical with Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., except that i | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.