Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Martin v. Stategreen2 sentences1998“Absent a factual foundation for the reckless conduct instruction, the trial court properly rejected that request to charge. [Cits.]” Carter, supra at 404 ; Martin v. State, 268 Ga. 682, 685 (7) ( 492 SE2d 225 ) (1997). 2. 1998“Absent a factual foundation for the reckless conduct instruction, the trial court properly rejected that request to charge. [Cits.]” Carter, supra at 404 ; Martin v. State, 268 Ga. 682, 685 (7) ( 492 SE2d 225 ) (1997). 2. | 2 | 2 |
Cain v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Cain v. State, 288 Ga. App. 535, 537 (2) (654 SE2d 456) (2007). 2025Cain v. State, 288 Ga. App. 535, 537 (2) (654 SE2d 456) (2007). | 1 | 1 |
Patterson v. the Stategreen1 sentence2023For example, in Patterson, we held that a reckless conduct charge was not warranted as to a charge of fear-of-injury aggravated assault because the facts of the case were “undisputed that [the defendant] drove his van and struck and injured [the victim].” 332 Ga. App. at 228 (1) (b). | 1 | 1 |
Bowers v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Cauley, 206 Ga. App. at 234 (2); compare Bowers v. State, 177 Ga. App. 36, 38 (2) ( 338 SE2d 457 ) (1985) (failure to give reckless conduct charge required reversal where defendant admitted firing gun intentionally but denied knowledge of victim’s presence). 1997Cauley, 206 Ga. App. at 234 (2); compare Bowers v. State, 177 Ga. App. 36, 38 (2) ( 338 SE2d 457 ) (1985) (failure to give reckless conduct charge required reversal where defendant admitted firing gun intentionally but denied knowledge of victim’s presence). | 1 | 1 |
Cauley v. Stategreen1 sentence1997Cauley, 206 Ga. App. at 234 (2); compare Bowers v. State, 177 Ga. App. 36, 38 (2) ( 338 SE2d 457 ) (1985) (failure to give reckless conduct charge required reversal where defendant admitted firing gun intentionally but denied knowledge of victim’s presence). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bostic v. State
green
2 sentences2016That ruling was erroneous. 3 (a) In arguing that a reckless conduct instruction was not required, the State relied on the decisions in Banta; Bostic v. State, 284 Ga. 864 ( 672 SE2d 630 ) (2009); and Allen v. State, 247 Ga. App. 10 ( 543 SE2d 45 ) (2000). 2016That ruling was erroneous. 3 (a) In arguing that a reckless conduct instruction was not required, the State relied on the decisions in Banta; Bostic v. State, 284 Ga. 864 ( 672 SE2d 630 ) (2009); and Allen v. State, 247 Ga. App. 10 ( 543 SE2d 45 ) (2000). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Allen v. State
green
2 sentences2016That ruling was erroneous. 3 (a) In arguing that a reckless conduct instruction was not required, the State relied on the decisions in Banta; Bostic v. State, 284 Ga. 864 ( 672 SE2d 630 ) (2009); and Allen v. State, 247 Ga. App. 10 ( 543 SE2d 45 ) (2000). 2016That ruling was erroneous. 3 (a) In arguing that a reckless conduct instruction was not required, the State relied on the decisions in Banta; Bostic v. State, 284 Ga. 864 ( 672 SE2d 630 ) (2009); and Allen v. State, 247 Ga. App. 10 ( 543 SE2d 45 ) (2000). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.