proceedings will result waiver in Pennsylvania

2026See also Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (noting that a failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue).

2025See also Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (“[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.”).

2022“The failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.” Commonwealth v. Tucker, 143 A.3d 955, 961 (Pa. Super. 2016) (internal quotation omitted).

2022It is axiomatic that “[t]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.” Commonwealth v. Tucker, 143 A.3d 955, 961 (Pa. Super. 2016) (citation omitted).

2025See N.T., 1/10/2023, at 83; see also Commonwealth v. Konias, 136 A.3d 1014, 1021-22 (Pa. Super. 2016) (“In order to preserve an issue for review, a party must make a timely and specific objection at trial. … Moreover, a party complaining, on appeal, of the admission of evidence in the court below will be confined to the specific objection there made.”); Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (“[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue”).

2024See Commonwealth v. Konias, 136 A.3d 1014, 1021-1022 (Pa. Super. 2016) (“‘In order to preserve an issue for review, a party must make a timely and specific objection at trial.’ Moreover, ‘[a] party complaining, on appeal, of the admission of evidence in the court below will be confined to the specific objection there made.’”) (citations omitted); Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (“[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.”). ______________________________

2017See Commonwealth v. Shamsud–Din, 995 A.2d 1224, 1226 (Pa.Super. 2010) (reiterating failure to object to jury instruction constitutes waiver of error in charge); Commonwealth v. duPont, 730 A.2d 970 , 984–85 (Pa.Super. 1999), appeal denied, 561 Pa. 669 , 749 A.2d 466 (2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1231 , 120 S.Ct. 2663 , 147 L.Ed.2d 276 (2000) (stating failure to object to particular verdict sheet constitutes waiver of its use).

2014See Commonwealth v. ShamsudDin, 995 A.2d 1224, 1226 (Pa.Super.2010) (reiterating failure to object to jury instruction constitutes waiver of error in charge); Commonwealth v. duPont, 730 A.2d 970, 984-85 (Pa.Super.1999), appeal denied, 561 Pa. 669 , 749 A.2d 466 (2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1231 , 120 S.Ct. 2663 , 147 L.Ed.2d 276 (2000) (stating failure to object to particular verdict sheet constitutes waiver of its use).

2025We agree with both contentions. “[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue [on appeal].” Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (citations omitted); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); see Commonwealth v. Christian, 389 A.2d 545, 547 (Pa. Super 1978) (“Appellant made prompt objection to [the court’s ruling on the proposed question] and preserved the issue for appellate review.”); see also Commonwealth v. Scott, 212 A.3d 1094, 1104 (Pa. Super. 2019) (finding waiver of issue on app

2025We agree with both contentions. “[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue [on appeal].” Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (citations omitted); Pa.R.A.P. 302(a); see Commonwealth v. Christian, 389 A.2d 545, 547 (Pa. Super 1978) (“Appellant made prompt objection to [the court’s ruling on the proposed question] and preserved the issue for appellate review.”); see also Commonwealth v. Scott, 212 A.3d 1094, 1104 (Pa. Super. 2019) (finding waiver of issue on app

2023See Tucker, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Cash, 635 Pa. 451 , 137 A.3d 1262 (2016), cert. denied, 580 U.S. 1161 , 137 S.Ct. 1202 , 197 L.Ed.2d 249 (2017) (explaining that appellant waives claim on appeal where objection raised at trial was different ground for relief than that raised on appeal).

2023See Tucker, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Cash, 635 Pa. 451 , 137 A.3d 1262 (2016), cert. denied, 580 U.S. 1161 , 137 S.Ct. 1202 , 197 L.Ed.2d 249 (2017) (explaining that appellant waives claim on appeal where objection raised at trial was different ground for relief than that raised on appeal).

2023See Tucker, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Cash, 635 Pa. 451 , 137 A.3d 1262 (2016), cert. denied, 580 U.S. 1161 , 137 S.Ct. 1202 , 197 L.Ed.2d 249 (2017) (explaining that appellant waives claim on appeal where objection raised at trial was different ground for relief than that raised on appeal).

2023See Tucker, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Cash, 635 Pa. 451 , 137 A.3d 1262 (2016), cert. denied, 580 U.S. 1161 , 137 S.Ct. 1202 , 197 L.Ed.2d 249 (2017) (explaining that appellant waives claim on appeal where objection raised at trial was different ground for relief than that raised on appeal).

2019See Commonwealth v. Cornelius, 180 A.3d 1256 , 1261–62 (Pa. Super. 2018) (finding claim challenging denial of motion for mistrial waived where defense counsel failed to object at the time the alleged prejudicial statement was made); see also Commonwealth v. Tucker, 143 A.3d 955, 961 (Pa. Super. 2016) (“[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.”).

2018It is well established that “the failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.” Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014); see also Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) (providing that “[i]ssues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Commonwealth v. Duffy, 832 A.2d 1132, 1137 (Pa. Super. 2003) (holding claim that trial court erred by failing to conduct an on-the-record colloquy regarding the defendant’s right to testify was waived for fai

2018As an initial matter, we must determine whether Appellant waived this issue for review. “[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the ____________________________________________ 1 “An appellant whose revocation of probation sentence has been imposed after a revocation proceeding has 30 days to appeal [the] sentence from the day [the] sentence is entered, regardless of whether or not [he or] she files a post-sentence motion.” Commonwealth v. Parlante, 823 A.2d 927, 929 (Pa.Super. 2003) (citing Pa.R.Crim.P. 708(D)). -4- J-S03036-18 trial court at the appropriate stage of the

2016In Commonwealth v. Pressley, 887 A.2d 220, 224 (Pa.Super. 2006), the Court stated, that: 18 "The pertinent rules, therefore, require a specific objection to the charge or an exception to the trial court's ruling on a proposed point to preserve an issue involving a jury instruction.

2015See Brooks, supra; Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) (“Issues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Commonwealth v. Houck, 102 A.3d 443, 451 (Pa. Super. 2014) (“[T]he failure to make a timely and specific objection before the trial court at the appropriate stage of the proceedings will result in waiver of the issue.”).