Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Beasley v. Stategreen2 sentences2022See, e.g., Cooper, 306 Ga. at 165 (holding that under the doctrine of res judicata, the previous denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal bars a new motion for an out-of-time appeal); Beasley v. State, 298 Ga. 49, 50 (779 SE2d 301) (2015) (“[T]he doctrine of res judicata precludes not only re-litigation of claims that were actually adjudicated in the prior cause of action, but those which could have been adjudicated therein.”). 2022See, e.g., Cooper, 306 Ga. at 165 (holding that under the doctrine of res judicata, the previous denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal bars a new motion for an out-of-time appeal); Beasley v. State, 298 Ga. 49, 50 (779 SE2d 301) (2015) (“[T]he doctrine of res judicata precludes not only re-litigation of claims that were actually adjudicated in the prior cause of action, but those which could have been adjudicated therein.”). | 3 | 5 |
Cooper v. Stategreen2 sentences2022See, e.g., Cooper, 306 Ga. at 165 (holding that under the doctrine of res judicata, the previous denial of a motion for an out-of-time appeal bars a new motion for an out-of-time appeal); Beasley v. State, 298 Ga. 49, 50 ( 779 SE2d 301 ) (2015) (“[T]he doctrine of res judicata precludes not only re-litigation of claims that were actually adjudicated in the prior cause of action, but those which could have been adjudicated therein.”). 2022See, e.g., Cooper, 306 Ga. at 165 (holding that under the doctrine of res judicata, the previous denial of a motion for out-of-time appeal bars a new motion for an out-of-time appeal); Beasley v. State, 298 Ga. 49, 50 (779 SE2d 301) (2015) (“[T]he doctrine of res judicata precludes not only re-litigation of claims that were actually adjudicated in the prior cause of action, but those which could have been adjudicated therein.”). | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Stategreen1 sentence2022Any attempted re-litigation of these claims would, therefore, be barred. 4 otherwise not yet final” when the opinion issued. 313 Ga. at 506 (5). | 1 | 1 |
Wiggins v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Wiggins v. State, 288 Ga. 169, 170 (1) ( 702 SE2d 865 ) (2010) (Citations and punctuation omitted.) And, although Beasley did not assert in the habeas court that the trial court failed, sua sponte, to inquire into his competency at his plea hearing, the doctrine of res judicata precludes not only re-litigation of claims that were actually adjudicated in the prior cause of action, but those which could have been adjudicated therein. 2015Wiggins v. State, 288 Ga. 169, 170 (1) ( 702 SE2d 865 ) (2010) (Citations and punctuation omitted.) And, although Beasley did not assert in the habeas court that the trial court failed, sua sponte, to inquire into his competency at his plea hearing, the doctrine of res judicata precludes not only re-litigation of claims that were actually adjudicated in the prior cause of action, but those which could have been adjudicated therein. | 1 | 1 |
Body of Christ Overcoming Church of God, Inc. v. Brinsongreen2 sentences2015Body of Christ Overcoming Church of God v. Brinson, 287 Ga. 485, 486 ( 696 SE2d 667 ) (2010). 2015Body of Christ Overcoming Church of God v. Brinson, 287 Ga. 485, 486 ( 696 SE2d 667 ) (2010). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||