Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1969–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wallace v. Wallacegreen2 sentences2016See also Wallace, 225 Ga. at 109-112 (3) (a) (holding that “creation of a unified state bar was properly a judicial function for the highest court in our judicial department”). 1969In Wallace v. Wallace, 225 Ga. 102 , supra, it was held that the creation of a unified state bar is a judicial function. | 1 | 3 |
Clark v. Arizonagreen1 sentence2021See also id. at 140 SCt 1039 (II) (Breyer, J., dissenting) (“The Court contends that the historical formulations of the insanity defense were so diverse, so contested, as to make it impossible to discern a unified principle that Kansas’ approach offends. | 1 | 1 |
Lamb v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Lamb, 267 Ga. at 42 (1); Taylor v. State, 320 Ga. App. 596, 605 (2) ( 740 SE2d 327 ) (2013); Mitchell v. State, 312 Ga. App. 293, 298 (3) ( 718 SE2d 126 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Lamb, 267 Ga. at 42 (1); Taylor v. State, 320 Ga. App. 596, 605 (2) ( 740 SE2d 327 ) (2013); Mitchell v. State, 312 Ga. App. 293, 298 (3) ( 718 SE2d 126 ) (2011). 2015See Lamb, 267 Ga. at 42 (1); Taylor v. State, 320 Ga. App. 596, 605 (2) ( 740 SE2d 327 ) (2013); Mitchell v. State, 312 Ga. App. 293, 298 (3) ( 718 SE2d 126 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Mitchell v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Lamb, 267 Ga. at 42 (1); Taylor v. State, 320 Ga. App. 596, 605 (2) ( 740 SE2d 327 ) (2013); Mitchell v. State, 312 Ga. App. 293, 298 (3) ( 718 SE2d 126 ) (2011). 2015See Lamb, 267 Ga. at 42 (1); Taylor v. State, 320 Ga. App. 596, 605 (2) ( 740 SE2d 327 ) (2013); Mitchell v. State, 312 Ga. App. 293, 298 (3) ( 718 SE2d 126 ) (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Schofield v. Holseygreen2 sentences2012See Holsey, 281 Ga. at 811-812, n. 1 . 2012Thus, even assuming that trial counsel performed deficiently by not having Dr. Stark conduct additional testing to determine a specific label to place on Riley’s mental and emotional condition that he described at trial and by not complying with discovery rules to the trial court’s satisfaction, we conclude that any such deficiency was not significantly prejudicial when considered in the context of Riley’s overall ineffective assistance of counsel claim, which we analyze as a unified claim below in Division II (K). 7 See Holsey, 281 Ga. at 811-812, n. 1 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.