Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Swangreen2 sentences2017In re Marriage of Swan, 526 N.W.2d 320, 326 (Iowa 1995). 2014In re Marriage of Swan, 526 N.W.2d 320, 326 (Iowa 1995). | 2 | 2 |
State of Iowa v. Charles James David Olivergreen1 sentence2014See id. at 648 (noting the unique factors of Bruegger’s case). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bruegger
green
2 sentences2017Bruegger, 773 N.W.2d at 885 . 2012The unique factors at issue in Bruegger were “a broadly framed crime, the permissible use of preteen adjudications as prior convictions to enhance the crime, and a dramatic sentence enhancement for repeat offenders.” 12 Id. | 3 | 2012–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.