Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1978–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Olvera v. Del's Auto Bodygreen2 sentences1991Olvera v. Del's Auto Body, 118 Idaho 163, 165 , 795 P.2d 862, 864 (1990) (citations omitted). 1991Olvera v. Del's Auto Body, 118 Idaho 163, 165 , 795 P.2d 862, 864 (1990) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Burns v. Nyberggreen2 sentences1987Burdick v. Thornton, 109 Idaho 869 , 712 P.2d 570 (1985); Burns v. Nyberg, 108 Idaho 151 , 697 P.2d 1165 *465 (1985); Ledesma v. Bergeson, 99 Idaho 555 , 585 P.2d 965 (1978); Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 (1960). 1987Burdick v. Thornton, 109 Idaho 869 , 712 P.2d 570 (1985); Burns v. Nyberg, 108 Idaho 151 , 697 P.2d 1165 *465 (1985); Ledesma v. Bergeson, 99 Idaho 555 , 585 P.2d 965 (1978); Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ledesma v. Bergeson
green
2 sentences1986The integral test then is whether the contract gives, or the employer assumes, the right to control the time, manner and *778 method of executing the work, as distinguished from the right merely to require certain definite results in conformity to the contract. [Citations omitted.] As in Ledesma, supra, 99 Idaho at 557 , 585 P.2d at 967 , so, too, here, our “only question ... is whether the Industrial Commission made a proper application of law to [the] evidence.” Id. 1986The integral test then is whether the contract gives, or the employer assumes, the right to control the time, manner and *778 method of executing the work, as distinguished from the right merely to require certain definite results in conformity to the contract. [Citations omitted.] As in Ledesma, supra, 99 Idaho at 557 , 585 P.2d at 967 , so, too, here, our “only question ... is whether the Industrial Commission made a proper application of law to [the] evidence.” Id. | 2 | 1986–1987 |
Sines v. Sines
green
2 sentences1990Sines v. Sines, 110 Idaho 776 , 718 P.2d 1214 (1986). 1990Sines v. Sines, 110 Idaho 776 , 718 P.2d 1214 (1986). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Burdick v. Thornton
green
2 sentences1987Burdick v. Thornton, 109 Idaho 869 , 712 P.2d 570 (1985); Burns v. Nyberg, 108 Idaho 151 , 697 P.2d 1165 *465 (1985); Ledesma v. Bergeson, 99 Idaho 555 , 585 P.2d 965 (1978); Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 (1960). 1987Burdick v. Thornton, 109 Idaho 869 , 712 P.2d 570 (1985); Burns v. Nyberg, 108 Idaho 151 , 697 P.2d 1165 *465 (1985); Ledesma v. Bergeson, 99 Idaho 555 , 585 P.2d 965 (1978); Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 (1960). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.
green
2 sentences1987Burdick v. Thornton, 109 Idaho 869 , 712 P.2d 570 (1985); Burns v. Nyberg, 108 Idaho 151 , 697 P.2d 1165 *465 (1985); Ledesma v. Bergeson, 99 Idaho 555 , 585 P.2d 965 (1978); Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 (1960). 1987Burdick v. Thornton, 109 Idaho 869 , 712 P.2d 570 (1985); Burns v. Nyberg, 108 Idaho 151 , 697 P.2d 1165 *465 (1985); Ledesma v. Bergeson, 99 Idaho 555 , 585 P.2d 965 (1978); Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co., 82 Idaho 410 , 353 P.2d 657 (1960). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Anderson v. Gailey
green
2 sentences1984Accordingly, the trial court erred in this case by instructing the jury in Instruction No. 31: “The integral test [of employer under I.C. § 72-102(10)] is whether the contract gives, or Shearer Lumber Products, Inc., assumed, the right to control the time, manner, and method of executing the work, as distinguished from the right merely to require certain definite results in conformity to the contract.” The right-to-control test is relevant in determining whether the injured person is an employee covered by workmen’s compensation, or whether the person is an independent contractor not entitled 1984Accordingly, the trial court erred in this case by instructing the jury in Instruction No. 31: “The integral test [of employer under I.C. § 72-102(10)] is whether the contract gives, or Shearer Lumber Products, Inc., assumed, the right to control the time, manner, and method of executing the work, as distinguished from the right merely to require certain definite results in conformity to the contract.” The right-to-control test is relevant in determining whether the injured person is an employee covered by workmen’s compensation, or whether the person is an independent contractor not entitled | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Alexander-Bland Lumber Co. v. Jenkins
green
2 sentences1978Alexander-Bland Lumber Co. v. Jenkins, 87 Ga.App. 678, 75 S.E.2d 355 (1953); Medford Lumber Co. v. Mahner, 197 Wis. 35 , 221 N.W. 390 (1928). 1978Alexander-Bland Lumber Co. v. Jenkins, 87 Ga.App. 678, 75 S.E.2d 355 (1953); Medford Lumber Co. v. Mahner, 197 Wis. 35 , 221 N.W. 390 (1928). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Medford Lumber Co. v. Industrial Commission
neutral
2 sentences1978Alexander-Bland Lumber Co. v. Jenkins, 87 Ga.App. 678, 75 S.E.2d 355 (1953); Medford Lumber Co. v. Mahner, 197 Wis. 35 , 221 N.W. 390 (1928). 1978Alexander-Bland Lumber Co. v. Jenkins, 87 Ga.App. 678, 75 S.E.2d 355 (1953); Medford Lumber Co. v. Mahner, 197 Wis. 35 , 221 N.W. 390 (1928). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.