6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Karlson v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2016In the context of Rule 59(a)(6) motions, we have stated: “A trial court need not separately restate and reanalyze the same facts or evidence in deciding an I.R.C.P. 59(a)(6) motion for a new trial that were previously applied in deciding a motion for J.N.O.V. where a proper disposition of each motion necessarily rests upon the same facts or evidence.” Karlson v. Harris, 140 Idaho 561, 570 , 97 P.3d 428, 437 (2004). 2016In the context of Rule 59(a)(6) motions, we have stated: “A trial court need not separately restate and reanalyze the same facts or evidence in deciding an I.R.C.P. 59(a)(6) motion for a new trial that were previously applied in deciding a motion for J.N.O.V. where a proper disposition of each motion necessarily rests upon the same facts or evidence.” Karlson v. Harris, 140 Idaho 561, 570 , 97 P.3d 428, 437 (2004). | 3 | 3 |
SCHMECHEL v. Dillegreen2 sentences2011Schmechel v. Dille, 148 Idaho 176, 179 , 219 P.3d 1192, 1195 (2009). 2011Schmechel v. Dille, 148 Idaho 176, 179 , 219 P.3d 1192, 1195 (2009). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bates v. Seldin
green
2 sentences2011Again, employing the JNOV standard as provided in Bates v. Seldin, 146 Idaho at 774-75 , 203 P.3d at 704-05 , we shall consider whether any of the potential violations of ICPA provided in the jury instructions were supported by competent evidence such that a JNOV is inappropriate. 2011Again, employing the JNOV standard as provided in Bates v. Seldin, 146 Idaho at 774-75 , 203 P.3d at 704-05 , we shall consider whether any of the potential violations of ICPA provided in the jury instructions were supported by competent evidence such that a JNOV is inappropriate. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
April Beguesse, Inc. v. Kenneth Rammell
green
2 sentences2021Rammell, 156 Idaho at 509 , 328 P.3d at 489 . 2021Rammell, 156 Idaho at 509 , 328 P.3d at 489 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Horner v. Sani-Top, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Homer, 143 Idaho at 237 , 141 P.3d at 1106 . “[I]n order for an award of special damages to be upheld, the plaintiff must put on some type of proof to support the damage award. 2011Homer, 143 Idaho at 237 , 141 P.3d at 1106 . “[I]n order for an award of special damages to be upheld, the plaintiff must put on some type of proof to support the damage award. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.