Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jones v. Chicago Osteopathic Hospitalgreen2 sentences2021App. 3d 1121, 1125 , 738 N.E.2d 542, 547 (2000) (quoting McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 132 , 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), quoting Maple v. Gustafson, 151 Ill. 2d 445, 452-53 , 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992)). - 16 - ¶ 56 The JNOV standard is even more challenging than the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, which we have already determined Biundo did not meet. 2021App. 3d 1121, 1125 , 738 N.E.2d 542, 547 (2000) (quoting McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 132 , 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), quoting Maple v. Gustafson, 151 Ill. 2d 445, 452-53 , 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992)). - 16 - ¶ 56 The JNOV standard is even more challenging than the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, which we have already determined Biundo did not meet. | 2 | 2 |
Doyle v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp.green1 sentence2025Defendants further assert that (as argued in support of their request for JNOV) the court’s findings were against the manifest weight of the evidence, “even if, contrary to the evidence and arguments already presented above, [plaintiff] had offered evidence to establish each element of his causes of action for breach of contract and fraud.” 41 Nos. 1-23-0936, 1-23-1364 (cons.) Defendants then cite Doyle v. White Metal Rolling & Stamping Corp., 249 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Hallgreen2 sentences1998The court will not impose such liability." The court conditionally denied the City's request for entry of verdict on a special interrogatory and its motion for a new trial, but stated that if it had "found against the City on the scope of employment claim, it would have granted its JNOV motion on the immunity defenses and here so conditionally rules on that issue." (footnote: 4) [Nonpublishable material under Supreme Rule 23 omitted.] ANALYSIS [Nonpublishable material under Supreme Rule 23 omitted.] II SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT We review orders granting JNOV under a de novo standard ( Williams v. Ha 1998App. 3d 917, 919 , 681 N.E.2d 1037, 1038 (1997), citing Arellano v. SGL Abrasives , 246 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.
green
2 sentences2021App. 3d 1121, 1125 , 738 N.E.2d 542, 547 (2000) (quoting McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 132 , 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), quoting Maple v. Gustafson, 151 Ill. 2d 445, 452-53 , 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992)). - 16 - ¶ 56 The JNOV standard is even more challenging than the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, which we have already determined Biundo did not meet. 2021App. 3d 1121, 1125 , 738 N.E.2d 542, 547 (2000) (quoting McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 132 , 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), quoting Maple v. Gustafson, 151 Ill. 2d 445, 452-53 , 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992)). - 16 - ¶ 56 The JNOV standard is even more challenging than the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, which we have already determined Biundo did not meet. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
Maple v. Gustafson
green
2 sentences2021App. 3d 1121, 1125 , 738 N.E.2d 542, 547 (2000) (quoting McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 132 , 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), quoting Maple v. Gustafson, 151 Ill. 2d 445, 452-53 , 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992)). - 16 - ¶ 56 The JNOV standard is even more challenging than the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, which we have already determined Biundo did not meet. 2021App. 3d 1121, 1125 , 738 N.E.2d 542, 547 (2000) (quoting McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 132 , 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), quoting Maple v. Gustafson, 151 Ill. 2d 445, 452-53 , 603 N.E.2d 508 (1992)). - 16 - ¶ 56 The JNOV standard is even more challenging than the manifest-weight-of-the-evidence standard, which we have already determined Biundo did not meet. | 2 | 2020–2021 |
Crystal Lake Limited Partnership v. Baird & Warner Residential Sales, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Then, in a revised order, the court struck the manifest-weight language and substituted the following: “The verdict of the jury was based upon evidence that so - 15 2018 IL App (2d) 170714 overwhelmingly favored the defendant that any verdict to the contrary cannot possibly stand.” (Emphasis in original.) In so doing, the court orally acknowledged that it had intended to apply the JNOV standard in the original order but mistakenly announced the manifest-weight standard. 2018Then, in a revised order, the court struck the manifest-weight language and substituted the following: “The verdict of the jury was based upon evidence that so - 15 2018 IL App (2d) 170714 overwhelmingly favored the defendant that any verdict to the contrary cannot possibly stand.” (Emphasis in original.) In so doing, the court orally acknowledged that it had intended to apply the JNOV standard in the original order but mistakenly announced the manifest-weight standard. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Arellano v. S G L Abrasives
green
1 sentence1998App. 3d 917, 919 , 681 N.E.2d 1037, 1038 (1997), citing Arellano v. SGL Abrasives , 246 Ill. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.