Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fetterlygreen2 sentences2015State v. Beam, 115 Idaho 208, 210 , 766 P.2d 678, 680 (1988); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231, 233 , 766 P.2d 701, 703 (1988). 2015State v. Beam, 115 Idaho 208, 210 , 766 P.2d 678, 680 (1988); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231, 233 , 766 P.2d 701, 703 (1988). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Creechgreen2 sentences2023In State v. Creech, this Court explained in a footnote that “when legal issues are decided in a criminal action on direct appeal, the defendant is barred by the doctrine of res judicata from raising them again in a post- conviction relief proceeding.” 132 Idaho 1 , 9 n.1, 966 P.2d 1 , 9 n.1 (1998). 2023In State v. Creech, this Court explained in a footnote that “when legal issues are decided in a criminal action on direct appeal, the defendant is barred by the doctrine of res judicata from raising them again in a post- conviction relief proceeding.” 132 Idaho 1 , 9 n.1, 966 P.2d 1 , 9 n.1 (1998). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Beamgreen2 sentences2015State v. Beam, 115 Idaho 208, 210 , 766 P.2d 678, 680 (1988); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231, 233 , 766 P.2d 701, 703 (1988). 2015State v. Beam, 115 Idaho 208, 210 , 766 P.2d 678, 680 (1988); State v. Fetterly, 115 Idaho 231, 233 , 766 P.2d 701, 703 (1988). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.