Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. Estradagreen2 sentences2005App. 3d 792, 811 , 480 N.E.2d 1312, 1326 (1985) (relevant inquiry is not whether the judgment in fact altered the absent person’s interest in the subject matter but whether the absent person might claim a substantial interest). 2005App. 3d 792, 811 , 480 N.E.2d 1312, 1326 (1985) (relevant inquiry is not whether the judgment in fact altered the absent person's interest in the subject matter but whether the absent person might claim a substantial interest). | 3 | 3 |
People Ex Rel. Sheppard v. Moneygreen2 sentences2022Sheppard v. Money, 124 Ill. 2d 265, 281 (1988)). 2012Instead, it is whether the absent person might claim a substantial and present interest which determines that the person is a necessary and indispensable party.” Id. | 1 | 2 |
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Townsendgreen2 sentences2005In Northern Pacific, 190 U.S. at 267-68, 47 L. 2005In Northern Pacific, 190 U.S. at 267-68, 47 L. | 1 | 2 |
Feen v. Raygreen2 sentences2005See Feen v. Ray, 109 Ill.2d 339, 344 , 93 Ill.Dec. 794 , 487 N.E.2d 619, 620 (1985) (rule of equity that any person who is interested in the subject matter of the litigation is a necessary and indispensable party); Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. Estrada, 134 Ill.App.3d 792, 811 , 89 Ill.Dec. 569 , 480 N.E.2d 1312, 1326 (1985) (relevant inquiry is not whether the judgment in fact altered the absent person's interest in the subject matter but whether the absent person might claim a substantial interest). 2005See Feen v. Ray, 109 Ill.2d 339, 344 , 93 Ill.Dec. 794 , 487 N.E.2d 619, 620 (1985) (rule of equity that any person who is interested in the subject matter of the litigation is a necessary and indispensable party); Lakeview Trust & Savings Bank v. Estrada, 134 Ill.App.3d 792, 811 , 89 Ill.Dec. 569 , 480 N.E.2d 1312, 1326 (1985) (relevant inquiry is not whether the judgment in fact altered the absent person's interest in the subject matter but whether the absent person might claim a substantial interest). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howerton v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
neutral
1 sentence2022Instead, it is whether the absent person might claim a substantial and present interest which determines that the person is a necessary and indispensable party.’ ” Id. (quoting People ex rel. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Oglesby v. Springfield Marine Bank
green
2 sentences1979(Oglesby v. Springfield Marine Bank (1944), 385 Ill. 414 , 52 N.E.2d 1000 .) Under these circumstances, it appears that Bayzid did have an interest in the subject matter of the controversy which would be materially affected by a judgment entered in his absence. 1979(Oglesby v. Springfield Marine Bank (1944), 385 Ill. 414 , 52 N.E.2d 1000 .) Under these circumstances, it appears that Bayzid did have an interest in the subject matter of the controversy which would be materially affected by a judgment entered in his absence. | 1 | 1979–1979 |