Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp.green2 sentences2012July 1, 2002)) and the case law interpreting that rule.3 See generally Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp., 181 Ill. 2d 112, 124 (1998) (six factors must be considered before a drastic sanction may properly be imposed); In re Marriage of Lai, 253 Ill. 2007On this issue, in addition to the earlier cases we have mentioned, we have also considered Shimanousky v. General Motors Corp., 181 Ill. 2d 112, 123 , 692 N.E.2d 286, 291 (1998); Cirrincione v. Westminster Gardens Ltd. | 3 | 3 |
Nolan v. Weil-McLaingreen1 sentence2021People v. Abdullah, 2019 IL 123492, ¶ 18 (“interpretation of a supreme court rule [is] *** subject to de novo review”); Nolan v. Weil-McLain, 233 Ill. 2d 416, 429 (2009) (where judgment is “based upon *** interpretation of existing case law” the “review is de novo”). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Abdullahgreen1 sentence2021People v. Abdullah, 2019 IL 123492, ¶ 18 (“interpretation of a supreme court rule [is] *** subject to de novo review”); Nolan v. Weil-McLain, 233 Ill. 2d 416, 429 (2009) (where judgment is “based upon *** interpretation of existing case law” the “review is de novo”). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Laigreen1 sentence2012July 1, 2002)) and the case law interpreting that rule.3 See generally Shimanovsky v. General Motors Corp., 181 Ill. 2d 112, 124 (1998) (six factors must be considered before a drastic sanction may properly be imposed); In re Marriage of Lai, 253 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rios v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
green
1 sentence1992Basically, the law states that Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions (IPI), which were devised for a court to instruct a jury on the law in an impartial and non-argumentative manner, shall be used unless the court determines that they do not accurately state the law. [Citations.] The use of non-IPI instructions in addition to IPI instructions is improper where the IPI instructions correctly and adequately charge the jury. [Citation.] By the same token, however, each party has the right to have the jury instructed on his or her theory of the case, and the trial court must instruct the jury on all | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Jenkins
green
1 sentence1982In People v. Jenkins (1970), 128 Ill. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.