Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2020See People v. Cherry, 2016 IL 118728, ¶ 24 (holding that, to satisfy the two-pronged test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), a defendant must demonstrate ineffective assistance by showing that his counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficient performance prejudiced the defense). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Cherrygreen1 sentence2020See People v. Cherry, 2016 IL 118728, ¶ 24 (holding that, to satisfy the two-pronged test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), a defendant must demonstrate ineffective assistance by showing that his counsel’s performance was deficient and that this deficient performance prejudiced the defense). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Dupreegreen1 sentence2020See People v. Dupree, 2018 IL 122307, ¶ 44 (to satisfy the deficient performance prong of Strickland, a defendant must show that his counsel’s performance was so inadequate that he was not functioning as the counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment and, also, must overcome the strong presumption that any challenged action or inaction may have been the product of sound trial strategy). - 14 - ¶ 52 CONCLUSION ¶ 53 For the reasons set forth above, we affirm the judgment of the appellate court affirming defendant’s conviction and sentence. ¶ 54 Affirmed. ¶ 55 JUSTICE NEVILLE, dissenting: ¶ 56 Fol | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Stockton
green
2 sentences2021Id. ¶ 55 Toni posits, as she did at the clarification hearing, that the trial court could not say both that Steven proved a substantial change in circumstances and that the circumstances do not allow for a precise determination of Steven’s 2020 and 2021 income. 2021Id. ¶ 55 Toni posits, as she did at the clarification hearing, that the trial court could not say both that Steven proved a substantial change in circumstances and that the circumstances do not allow for a precise determination of Steven’s 2020 and 2021 income. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2008Ed. 2d 469 , 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993), because it constitutes a clarification of the standard for admission of scientific evidence. 2008Ed. 2d 469 , 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993), because it constitutes a clarification of the standard for admission of scientific evidence. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Village of Wilsonville v. SCA Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence1984It is true that “[without an express statutory provision stating an act is to have retroactive effect, it can only be applied prospectively.” (Village of Wilsonville v. SCA Services, Inc. (1981), 86 Ill. 2d 1, 18 .) Because we find that House Bill 1400 merely clarified the existing law, this proposition of law has no bearing on our determination of this issue. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.