forcible entry and detainer claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

forcible entry and detainer claim in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2009 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
CONTINENTAL ILL. NAT'L BK. & T. CO. v. Wilsongreen
illappct · 1982 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994App. 3d 67, 71 , 339 N.E.2d 283 .) Matters not germane to the issue of possession may not be litigated in a forcible entry and detainer action; the action should be "unhampered and unimpeded by questions of title and other collateral matters.” (Rosewood Corp. v. Fisher (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 249, 255 , 263 N.E.2d 833 .) The "sole issue to be decided by the court [is] possession, and possession is a quantum of estate far less than title.” Wilson, 103 Ill.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Yale Tavern, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan National Bank green
illappct · 1994
2 sentences

2004Forcible entry actions are summary, statutory proceedings, and "[a] court hearing a forcible entry and detainer claim is considered 'a court of special and limited jurisdiction.' [Citation.]" Yale Tavern, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan National Bank , 259 Ill.

2004Forcible entry actions are summary, statutory proceedings, and “[a] court hearing a forcible entry and detainer claim is considered ‘a court of special and limited jurisdiction.’ [Citation.]” Yale Tavern, Inc. v. Cosmopolitan National Bank, 259 Ill.

42004–2009
Avenaim v. Lubecke green
illappct · 2004
2 sentences

2009“Forcible entry actions are summary, statutory proceedings, and ‘[a] court hearing a forcible entry and detainer claim is considered “a court of special and limited jurisdiction.” [Citation.]’ ” Avenaim, 347 Ill.

2009"Forcible entry actions are summary, statutory proceedings, and '[a] court hearing a forcible entry and detainer claim is considered "a court of special and limited jurisdiction." [Citation.]'" Avenaim, 347 Ill.

22009–2009
Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Banks neutral
illappct · 1975
2 sentences

1994The statute is in derogation of the common law, and therefore a court hearing a forcible entry and detainer claim is considered "a court of special and limited jurisdiction for that proceeding.” (Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. Banks (1975), 34 Ill.

1994App. 3d 67, 71 , 339 N.E.2d 283 .) Matters not germane to the issue of possession may not be litigated in a forcible entry and detainer action; the action should be "unhampered and unimpeded by questions of title and other collateral matters.” (Rosewood Corp. v. Fisher (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 249, 255 , 263 N.E.2d 833 .) The "sole issue to be decided by the court [is] possession, and possession is a quantum of estate far less than title.” Wilson, 103 Ill.

11994–1994
Rosewood Corp. v. Fisher green
ill · 1970
2 sentences

1994App. 3d 67, 71 , 339 N.E.2d 283 .) Matters not germane to the issue of possession may not be litigated in a forcible entry and detainer action; the action should be "unhampered and unimpeded by questions of title and other collateral matters.” (Rosewood Corp. v. Fisher (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 249, 255 , 263 N.E.2d 833 .) The "sole issue to be decided by the court [is] possession, and possession is a quantum of estate far less than title.” Wilson, 103 Ill.

1994App. 3d 67, 71 , 339 N.E.2d 283 .) Matters not germane to the issue of possession may not be litigated in a forcible entry and detainer action; the action should be "unhampered and unimpeded by questions of title and other collateral matters.” (Rosewood Corp. v. Fisher (1970), 46 Ill. 2d 249, 255 , 263 N.E.2d 833 .) The "sole issue to be decided by the court [is] possession, and possession is a quantum of estate far less than title.” Wilson, 103 Ill.

11994–1994
Twin-City Inn, Inc. v. Hahne Enterprises, Inc. green
ill · 1967
2 sentences

1992In its reply brief, plaintiff now concedes that under the decision in Twin-City Inn, Inc. v. Hahne Enterprises, Inc. (1967), 37 Ill. 2d 133 , 225 N.E.2d 630 , submission of that portion of the case to the jury was proper.

1992In its reply brief, plaintiff now concedes that under the decision in Twin-City Inn, Inc. v. Hahne Enterprises, Inc. (1967), 37 Ill. 2d 133 , 225 N.E.2d 630 , submission of that portion of the case to the jury was proper.

11992–1992

Where else courts name it

OH 10 (1999–2025) IL 6 (1992–2009) OK 2 (2014–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check