Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1902–1992 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mandelke v. International House of Pancakes, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1992Mandelke v. International House of Pancakes, Inc. (1985), 131 Ill. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Greenlee v. First National Bank
green
1 sentence1992App. 3d 236 , 529 N.E.2d 723 .) Where a lease contains a clause making the lessee generally responsible for repairs, the expense of repairing subsequently discovered defects falls upon the lessee. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Koenigshofer v. Shumate
green
1 sentence1985(Koenigshofer v. Shumte (1966), 68 Ill. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Klein v. Ickovitz
green
1 sentence1968In a recent opinion — Klein v. Ickovitz, 72 Ill App2d 59, 219 NE2d 73 — the court also held that where the lease contains a clause to the effect that lessee’s duty to pay rent survives his eviction in a forcible detainer proceeding, the lessor may proceed under the lease. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Price v. York
green
1 sentence1966It is well established that where a lease contains a clause making the lessee generally responsible for repairs, the expense of repairing subsequently discovered deficiencies falls upon the lessee, unless the deficiency is so substantial and unforeseen as to be termed “structural.” See Kaufman v. Shoe Corp. of America, 24 Ill App2d 431, 436, 164 NE2d 617 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Kew v. Trainor
green
1 sentence1903Keio v. Trainor, supra. The lease contains a clause empowering the lessor, in case of default in any of the covenants of the lease, to declare the lease forfeited and re-enter and,take possession of the leased premises, but there is no force in the contention of the appellant that the lessor must either consent to and ratify the alleged assignment to Harris in violation of the covenants of the. lease, or exercise the power to declare a forfeiture. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Chadwick v. Parker
neutral
1 sentence1902In Chadwick v. Parker, 44 Ill. 326 , the court holds that this section was obviously designed to dispense with the necessity of making the common law demand of rent on the very day it fell due, and to give a remedy where the lease contains no clause of re-entry. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Leary v. Pattison
neutral
1 sentence1902It is clear to us that the change of the language used in section 2, above noticed, from “ default in payment of rent due, or any of the covenants of a lease,” to “ any of the terms of a lease,” as now used in section 9, the legislature intended to give this remedy for the failure of the tenant to perform any of the stipulations contained in the lease, and for such, a re-entry is given by the statute, whether contained in the lease or not, as was said in the case last cited, and repeated in Leary v. Pattison, 66 Ill. 203 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.