Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Power Dry of Chicago, Inc. v. Beangreen1 sentence2025See Power Dry of Chicago, Inc. v. Bean, 2022 IL App (2d) 210043, ¶ 44 (“The Mechanics Lien Act assumes a valid contract exists between the parties.”); Fandel v. Allen, 398 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Abbott Electrical Construction Co. v. Ladingreen1 sentence2025Id. (citing Abbott Electrical Construction Co. v. Ladin, 144 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Doug Hambel's Plumbing, Inc. v. Conwaygreen1 sentence2025Ct. App. 2011) (holding that quantum meruit does not establish the contractual relationship necessary to form the basis for filing a mechanics lien claim under North Carolina law); Doug Hambel’s Plumbing, Inc. v. Conway, 831 So. 2d 704, 705 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002) (noting that because a contract implied in law is not a contract, a mechanics lien is not available under Florida law based on a contract implied in law); Gebhart v. United States, 174 N.E. 2d 615 , 621-22 (Ohio 1961) (noting that the reference to an “implied contract” under Ohio’s mechanics lien statute is limited to a contract implied | 1 | 1 |
Fandel v. Allengreen1 sentence2025See Power Dry of Chicago, Inc. v. Bean, 2022 IL App (2d) 210043, ¶ 44 (“The Mechanics Lien Act assumes a valid contract exists between the parties.”); Fandel v. Allen, 398 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Clark v. Manninggreen2 sentences2021See Clark v. Manning, 95 Ill. 580, 583 (1880). -9- No. 1-20-0924 suit, suit shall be commenced or answer filed within 30 days thereafter, or the lien shall be forfeited.” Id. § 34(a). 2021See Clark v. Manning, 95 Ill. 580, 583 (1880). -9- No. 1-20-0924 suit, suit shall be commenced or answer filed within 30 days thereafter, or the lien shall be forfeited.” Id. § 34(a). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
CANDICE CO. INC. v. Ricketts
green
2 sentences2015Id. ¶ 31 It is well settled that a motion to vacate the sale pursuant to section 15-1508(b) is within the court's discretion to either grant or deny and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion. 2015Id. ¶ 31 It is well settled that a motion to vacate the sale pursuant to section 15-1508(b) is within the court’s discretion to either grant or deny and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of that discretion. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Barry Mogul & Associates, Inc. v. Terrestris Development Co.
green
1 sentence2025But - 29 - 2025 IL App (2d) 240479-U Barry Mogul & Associates actually states that the term quantum meruit “is an expression that describes the extent of liability on a contract implied in law (also called a “quasi-contract”).” (Emphasis added.) Barry Mogul & Associates, 267 Ill. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Bhutani v. Barrington Bank & Trust Co., N.A.
green
1 sentence2025Bhutani v. Barrington Bank & Trust Co., 2024 IL App (2d) 230162, ¶ 30 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Northwest Millwork Co. v. Komperda
green
1 sentence2025Id. (citing Abbott Electrical Construction Co. v. Ladin, 144 Ill. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Lohmann Golf Designs, Inc. v. Keisler
green
1 sentence2025As noted in the preceding paragraph, however, despite these findings, Judge Jasica, in ruling on defendant’s posttrial motions, stated that plaintiff “had a reasonable basis in fact and under the law *** to assert that it had a mechanic’s [sic] lien claim against the property in the substantial amount based on the underlying alleged oral contract.” Thus, we reject this as a basis to reverse the trial court’s denial of attorney fees. ¶ 52 In support of its attorney fee argument, defendant directs us to Lohmann Golf Designs, Inc. v. Keisler, 260 Ill. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Father & Sons Home Improvement II, Inc. v. Stuart
green
1 sentence2021Father & Sons Home Improvement II, Inc., 2016 IL App (1st) 143666, ¶ 30 . ¶ 38 Section 7(a) of the Act provides that no lien “shall be defeated to the proper amount thereof because of an error or overcharging on the part of any person claiming a lien therefor under this Act, unless it shall be shown that such error or overcharge is made with intent to defraud.” 770 ILCS 60/7(a) (West 2018). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.