procedural forfeiture claim (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

procedural forfeiture claim in Illinois

6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Kokoraleisgreen
ill · 1994 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016Peo- ple v. Kokoraleis, 159 Ill. 2d 325, 328 , 637 N.E.2d 1015, 1017 (1994).

2016Peo- ple v. Kokoraleis, 159 Ill. 2d 325, 328 , 637 N.E.2d 1015, 1017 (1994).

22
People v. Thompsongreen
ill · 2010 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Id. ¶ 76 “ ‘The first step of plain-error review,’ ” the appellate court reasoned in Flagg, “ ‘is determining whether any error occurred.’ ” Id. (quoting People v. Thompson, 238 Ill. 2d 598, 613 (2010)).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
In Re MW green
ill · 2009
2 sentences

2017In re M.W., 232 Ill. 2d 408 , 430 (2009).

2017In re M.W., 232 Ill. 2d 408 , 430 (2009).

22017–2017
People v. Crawford green
illappct · 2023
1 sentence

2024Characterizing defendant as “extendable” was a clear or obvious error (see 730 ILCS 5/5-5-3.2(b)(1) (West 2020)), and the plain error doctrine averts the procedural forfeiture of this error (see Crawford, 2023 IL App (4th) 210503, ¶ 46 ). ¶ 25 C.

12024–2024

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check