Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1920–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Intech, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc.green2 sentences1997Their claim must be adjudicated according to the uniform federal standard of the Carmack Amendment, for that standard provides the exclusive remedy where "the substance of the action is 'nothing more than an action for damages against the delivering carrier.’ ” Intech, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., 836 F.2d 672, 677 (1st Cir. 1987), quoting Georgia, Florida & Alabama Ry. 1997Their claim must be adjudicated according to the uniform federal standard of the Carmack Amendment, for that standard provides the exclusive remedy where "the substance of the action is `nothing more than an action for damages against the delivering carrier.'" Intech, Inc. v. Consolidated Freightways, Inc., 836 F.2d 672, 677 (1st Cir.1987); see also Georgia, Florida & Alabama Ry. | 2 | 2 |
Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.green2 sentences1997Co. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 U.S. 190, 197 , 36 S.Ct. 541, 544 , 60 L.Ed. 948, 952 (1916), quoting Georgia, Florida & Alabama *445 Ry. 1997Co. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 U.S. 190, 197 , 36 S.Ct. 541, 544 , 60 L.Ed. 948, 952 (1916), quoting Georgia, Florida & Alabama *445 Ry. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
green
2 sentences2004Application of a uniform federal standard, not application of the various fifty states' laws, will further the Congressional objective of achieving uniformity in long distance carriers' service contracts." Universal Service , 300 F. Supp. 2d at 1119-20 . 2004Application of a uniform federal standard, not application of the various fifty states’ laws, will further the Congressional objective of achieving uniformity in long distance carriers’ service contracts.” Universal Service, 300 F. Supp. 2d at 1119-20 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Brady v. Southern Railway Co.
green
1 sentence1954Co., 320 U. S. 476 , as follows: “Only by a uniform federal rule as to the necessary amount of evidence may litigants under the federal act receive similar treatment in all states. [Citing Supreme Court decisions.] . . . | 1 | 1954–1954 |
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Starbird
green
2 sentences1920Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592 , is a review by the United States Supreme Court of a number of its opinions and this conclusion given: “Since the passage of the Carmack Amendment, the State court must be held to have known that interstate shipments were covered by a Uniform Federal rule which required the issuance of a bill of lading, and that that bill of lading contained the entire contract upon which the responsibilities of the parties rested.” Under the foregoing authorities, counsel for appellee insist that the entire liability of a carrier under an interstate shipment is determined by th 1920Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592 , is a review by the United States Supreme Court of a number of its opinions and this conclusion given: “Since the passage of the Carmack Amendment, the State court must be held to have known that interstate shipments were covered by a Uniform Federal rule which required the issuance of a bill of lading, and that that bill of lading contained the entire contract upon which the responsibilities of the parties rested.” Under the foregoing authorities, counsel for appellee insist that the entire liability of a carrier under an interstate shipment is determined by th | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.