6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Firestone v. Stategreen1 sentence2020In questioning the existence of the rule, the State relies on a statement by our supreme court in Sistrunk v. State, 36 N.E.3d 1051, 1054 (Ind. 2015), that “our recognition in Richardson of the 4 “The continuing crime doctrine essentially provides that actions that are sufficient in themselves to constitute separate criminal offenses may be so compressed in terms of time, place, singleness of purpose, and continuity of action as to constitute a single transaction.” Firestone v. State, 838 N.E.2d 468, 471 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Gary Sistrunk v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2020In questioning the existence of the rule, the State relies on a statement by our supreme court in Sistrunk v. State, 36 N.E.3d 1051, 1054 (Ind. 2015), that “our recognition in Richardson of the 4 “The continuing crime doctrine essentially provides that actions that are sufficient in themselves to constitute separate criminal offenses may be so compressed in terms of time, place, singleness of purpose, and continuity of action as to constitute a single transaction.” Firestone v. State, 838 N.E.2d 468, 471 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 588919green2 sentences2006See Broadcort Capital Corp. v. Summa Medical Corp., 972 F.2d 1183, 1194 (10th Cir.1992) ("Here, the evidence related to an entirely different claim-the evidence was not admitted to prove the validity or amount of the 'claim under negotiation. ... 2006See Broadcort Capital Corp. v. Summa Medical Corp., 972 F.2d 1183, 1194 (10th Cir.1992) ("Here, the evidence related to an entirely different claimthe evidence was not admitted to prove the validity or amount of the `claim under negotiation.' . . . | 1 | 1 |
Bowman v. Bowmangreen2 sentences1996An entirely different principle of public policy is at work in the present case, namely, the freedom to contract. 567 N.E.2d at 830-31 (citations omitted). 1996An entirely different principle of public policy is at work in the present case, namely, the freedom to contract. 567 N.E.2d at 830-31 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jordan v. State
green
2 sentences1973As stated in our original opinion: “When a defendant tenders his supposed good character in evidence, he thereby invites scrutiny and disclosure of specific instances of his misconduct to depreciate the weight of the testimony of his character witness, although the answers elicited may incidentally impute to him other guilt.” Jordan v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 265, 268 , 110 N. E. 2d 751 . 1973As stated in our original opinion: “When a defendant tenders his supposed good character in evidence, he thereby invites scrutiny and disclosure of specific instances of his misconduct to depreciate the weight of the testimony of his character witness, although the answers elicited may incidentally impute to him other guilt.” Jordan v. State (1953), 232 Ind. 265, 268 , 110 N. E. 2d 751 . | 2 | 1973–1973 |
Insurance Co. of North America v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1901Co., 152 Ind. 333 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.