6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ajabu v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Ajabu v. State, 693 N.E.2d 921, 929 (Ind.1998). 2001Ajabu v. State, 693 N.E.2d 921, 929 (Ind.1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ceroni v. State
green
2 sentences1991We noted in Ceroni v. State (1990), Ind. App., 559 N.E.2d 372, 373 , transfer denied, that upon review of a claim of a Fourth Amendment violation, the first line of inquiry is to determine whether the defendant had a personal and legitimate expectation of privacy in the place searched. 1991We noted in Ceroni v. State (1990), Ind.App., 559 N.E.2d 372, 373 , transfer denied, that upon review of a claim of a Fourth Amendment violation, the first line of inquiry is to determine whether the defendant had a personal and legitimate expectation of privacy in the place searched. | 2 | 1991–1996 |
Perkins v. State
green
2 sentences1996Perkins v. State, 483 N.E.2d 1379 (Ind.1985); Ceroni v. State, 559 N.E.2d 372 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), trans. denied. 1996Perkins v. State, 483 N.E.2d 1379 (Ind.1985); Ceroni v. State, 559 N.E.2d 372 (Ind.Ct.App.1990), trans. denied. | 2 | 1990–1996 |
Florida v. Wells
green
2 sentences2017Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 , 110 S.Ct. 1632 , 109 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); Fair, 627 N.E.2d at 435 . 2017Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 , 110 S.Ct. 1632 , 109 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); Fair, 627 N.E.2d at 435 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Fair v. State
green
1 sentence2017Florida v. Wells, 495 U.S. 1, 4 , 110 S.Ct. 1632 , 109 L.Ed.2d 1 (1990); Fair, 627 N.E.2d at 435 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Anthem Ins. Companies v. Tenet Healthcare Corp.
green
2 sentences2001The court later reiterated, "[When evaluating questions of personal jurisdiction, the first line of inquiry is Trial Rule 4.4(A)" Id. at 1238 . 2001Our supreme court reasoned, "If the Indiana long-arm statute were intended to be coextensive with the limits of personal jurisdiction under the Due Process Clause, it could be written with the general language such as the 'any constitutional basis' statutes used in several other states." Id. at 1232 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.