6 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States Auto Club, Inc. v. Smithgreen1 sentence2014On appeal, we stated that “[a]lthough the third sentence of the release uses the word indemnity, it is not solely an indemnity clause and it clearly indicated that Plys will ‘hold harmless’ the Hammond defendants.” Id. at 4 ; see also U.S. Auto Club, Inc. v. Smith, 717 N.E.2d 919, 923 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (holding that a provision requiring plaintiff to “indemnify and hold harmless [the defendants] from loss, liability damage or cost they may incur due to the presence of the undersigned in or upon the restricted area, whether caused by the negligence of [the defendants] or otherwise” prevented | 1 | 1 |
Burrell v. Meadsgreen1 sentence2011See id. at 643 . 3 . | 1 | 1 |
Morris v. McDonald's Corp.green2 sentences2008See Morris v. McDonald’s Corp., 650 N.E.2d 1219, 1222 (Ind.Ct.App.1995). “[A]n an indemnity clause covers the risk of harm sustained by third persons that might be caused by either the indemnitor or the indemnitee” and shifts the burden to the indemnitor. 2 Id. 2008See Morris v. McDonald’s Corp., 650 N.E.2d 1219, 1222 (Ind.Ct.App.1995). “[A]n an indemnity clause covers the risk of harm sustained by third persons that might be caused by either the indemnitor or the indemnitee” and shifts the burden to the indemnitor. 2 Id. | 1 | 1 |
City of Terre Haute v. Simpsongreen1 sentence2003See Simpson, 746 N.E.2d at 363 . | 1 | 1 |
Peavler v. BD. OF COM'RS MONROE CTY.green2 sentences1999Peavler v. Board of Commissioners of Monroe County, 528 N.E.2d 40, 46 (Ind.1988). 1999Peavler v. Board of Commissioners of Monroe County, 528 N.E.2d 40, 46 (Ind.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Hinshaw v. Board of Com'rs of Jay Countygreen2 sentences1999In Hinshaw v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, 611 N.E.2d 637, 640-641 (Ind. 1993), the supreme court held that the language of this subsection was ambiguous, and that immunity under this subsection applied in actions where the plaintiff sought to impose vicarious liability upon the government because of third party conduct. 1999In Hinshaw v. Board of Commissioners of Jay County, 611 N.E.2d 637, 640-641 (Ind.1993), the supreme court held that the language of this subsection was ambiguous, and that immunity under this subsection applied in actions where the plaintiff sought to impose vicarious liability upon the government because of third party conduct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Hammond v. Plys
green
1 sentence2014On appeal, we stated that “[a]lthough the third sentence of the release uses the word indemnity, it is not solely an indemnity clause and it clearly indicated that Plys will ‘hold harmless’ the Hammond defendants.” Id. at 4 ; see also U.S. Auto Club, Inc. v. Smith, 717 N.E.2d 919, 923 (Ind. Ct. App. 1999) (holding that a provision requiring plaintiff to “indemnify and hold harmless [the defendants] from loss, liability damage or cost they may incur due to the presence of the undersigned in or upon the restricted area, whether caused by the negligence of [the defendants] or otherwise” prevented | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Beck v. City of Evansville
green
1 sentence2011Farley and Paul did not appeal that decision. [3] HSD cites to Beck v. City of Evansville, 842 N.E.2d 856 (Ind.Ct.App.2006), trans. denied, but that case is distinguishable. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Avant v. Community Hospital
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Moore Heating & Plumbing, Inc. v. Huber
green
1 sentence2008The trial court seemed to rely only on the first part of the release, which states that Plys “assumes the risk” and holds the Hammond defendants “harmless from any and all loss, claim, injury, damage, or liability sustained or incurred by me resulting therefrom.” Id. at 25 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Greathouse v. Armstrong
green
2 sentences1999In Greathouse v. Armstrong, 616 N.E.2d 364 (Ind.1993), our supreme court first discussed what has been labeled the public duty/private duty dichotomy. 1999In Greathouse v. Armstrong, 616 N.E.2d 364 (Ind.1993), our supreme court first discussed what has been labeled the public duty/private duty dichotomy. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.