6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bailey v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Bailey v. State, 907 N.E.2d 1003, 1005 (Ind. 2009). 2018Bailey v. State, 907 N.E.2d 1003, 1005 (Ind. 2009). | 3 | 3 |
Roy Bell v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2017Bell v. State, 31 N.E.3d 495, 500 (Ind. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
Joslyn v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Joslyn v. State, 942 N.E.2d 809, 811 (Ind.2011). | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. Stategreen1 sentence2014If a reasonable finder of fact could determine from the evidence that the 6 defendant was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, then we will uphold the verdict.” Baker v. State, 968 N.E.2d 227, 299 (Ind. 2012) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.