Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2013–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Salinas
green
2 sentences2025State v. Salinas, 119 Wn.2d 192, 201 , 829 P.2d 1068 (1992). 2016In reviewing an insufficient evidence claim, we assume “the truth of the State’s evidence and all inferences that reasonably can be drawn therefrom.” Id. | 6 | 2013–2025 |
State v. Rodriquez
green
2 sentences2022An insufficient evidence claim “admits the truth of the State’s evidence and all reasonable inferences from that evidence.” Id. 2017Due process requires the State to prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt) An insufficient evidence claim "admits the truth of the 1 State v. Rodriquez, 187 Wn. | 6 | 2016–2022 |
Jackson v. Virginia
red
2 sentences2022The critical inquiry is “‘whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Id. (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318 , 99 S. Ct. 2781 , 61 L. 2022The critical inquiry is “‘whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.’” Id. (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318 , 99 S. Ct. 2781 , 61 L. | 3 | 2016–2022 |
Jackson v. Quality Loan Serv. Corp. of Wash.
neutral
2 sentences2017App. 922, 930 , 352 P.3d 200 , review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1011 (2015). 2 State v. Joy, 121 Wn.2d 333, 338 , 851 P.2d 654 (1993). 3 Rodriquez, 187 Wn. 2017App. 922, 930 , 352 P.3d 200 , review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1011 (2015). 3 Id. 4Id. (quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 318 , 99 S. Ct. 2781 , 61 L. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences2015State v. Brown, 162 Wn.2d 422, 428 , 173 P.3d 245 (2007). 2014State v. Brown, 162 Wn.2d 422, 428 , 173 P. 3d 245 ( 2007). | 2 | 2014–2015 |
State v. Brown
green
2 sentences2015State v. Brown, 162 Wn.2d 422, 428 , 173 P.3d 245 (2007). 2014State v. Brown, 162 Wn.2d 422, 428 , 173 P. 3d 245 ( 2007). | 2 | 2014–2015 |
State v. McCreven
green
1 sentence2025Salinas, 119 Wn.2d at 201 ; McCreven, 170 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Brett
green
1 sentence2017App. at 19 (internal quotation marks omitted)(quoting Brett, 126 Wn.2d at 175 ). 16 No. 72951-9-1/17 Due process requires the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every element of a crime.45 An insufficient evidence claim "admits the truth of the State's evidence and all reasonable inferences from that evidence."46 The critical inquiry is "whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.'"47 We "view the 'evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and determine whether any rational fact finder could have found the essential ele | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Joy
green
2 sentences2017App. 922, 930 , 352 P.3d 200 , review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1011 (2015). 2 State v. Joy, 121 Wn.2d 333, 338 , 851 P.2d 654 (1993). 3 Rodriquez, 187 Wn. 2017App. 922, 930 , 352 P.3d 200 , review denied, 184 Wn.2d 1011 (2015). 2 State v. Joy, 121 Wn.2d 333, 338 , 851 P.2d 654 (1993). 3 Rodriquez, 187 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.