6 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wiseheart v. Stategreen1 sentence2013Id. at 991. | 1 | 1 |
Order for Mandate of Funds Montgomery County Council v. Milligangreen1 sentence2009The Indiana Rules of Professional Conduct provide guidance for determining the reasonableness of attorney's fees, including the following non-exclusive list of factors to be considered: (1) the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; (2) the likelihood, if apparent to the client, that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude other employment by the lawyer; (3) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; (4) the amount involved and the results obtain | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2003Id. at 593-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 . 2003Id. at 593-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 . | 3 | 1996–2003 |
Robert A. Masters v. Leah Masters
green
1 sentence2016Masters v. Masters, 43 N.E.3d 570 , 576 n.8 (Ind. 2015). [35] Father’s brief fails to mention the statutory basis for awarding attorney fees in dissolution-related proceedings. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.