Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Plummergreen1 sentence2012See Plummer, 295 Kan. 156 , Syl. ¶ 1. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thomas
green
1 sentence2024Mendez did not object to the instruction at trial, so we review for clear error. 26 Mendez claims the definition of "knowingly" in the aggravated robbery instruction was clearly erroneous because it used an "or" when it should have used an "and." The instruction as given read: "A defendant acts knowingly when the defendant is aware of the nature of his conduct that the State complains about, or of the circumstances in which he was acting, or that his conduct was reasonably certain to cause the result complained about by the State." (Emphasis added.) Mendez relies on State v. Hobbs, 301 Kan. 20 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Hobbs
green
2 sentences2024Mendez did not object to the instruction at trial, so we review for clear error. 26 Mendez claims the definition of "knowingly" in the aggravated robbery instruction was clearly erroneous because it used an "or" when it should have used an "and." The instruction as given read: "A defendant acts knowingly when the defendant is aware of the nature of his conduct that the State complains about, or of the circumstances in which he was acting, or that his conduct was reasonably certain to cause the result complained about by the State." (Emphasis added.) Mendez relies on State v. Hobbs, 301 Kan. 20 2024Mendez did not object to the instruction at trial, so we review for clear error. 26 Mendez claims the definition of "knowingly" in the aggravated robbery instruction was clearly erroneous because it used an "or" when it should have used an "and." The instruction as given read: "A defendant acts knowingly when the defendant is aware of the nature of his conduct that the State complains about, or of the circumstances in which he was acting, or that his conduct was reasonably certain to cause the result complained about by the State." (Emphasis added.) Mendez relies on State v. Hobbs, 301 Kan. 20 | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Boyd
green
1 sentence2014The first panel relied on the ruling in State v. Boyd, 46 Kan. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Robinson
green
1 sentence2013Jackson relies on State v. Robinson, 27 Kan. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Davis
green
1 sentence2001We observed that on a separate verdict form, the jury unanimously found Davis guilty of aggravated arson, which was a legally sufficient felony to support the felony-murder conviction. 247 Kan. at 573-74 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Myers
green
1 sentence1988This instruction appears consistent with our opinion in State v. Myers, 230 Kan 697, 640 P.2d 1245 (1982). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.