cloak immunity in Kansas

6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1966–1984 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Aldridgegreen kan · 1970 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971 2 sentences 1971See, also, State v. Jackson, 201 Kan. 795 , 443 P. 2d 279 , and State v. Aldridge, 204 Kan. 599, 603 , 464 P. 2d 8 . 1971See, also, State v. Jackson, 201 Kan. 795 , 443 P. 2d 279 , and State v. Aldridge, 204 Kan. 599, 603 , 464 P. 2d 8 .	1	1
State v. Jacksongreen kan · 1968 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1971–1971 2 sentences 1971See, also, State v. Jackson, 201 Kan. 795 , 443 P. 2d 279 , and State v. Aldridge, 204 Kan. 599, 603 , 464 P. 2d 8 . 1971See, also, State v. Jackson, 201 Kan. 795 , 443 P. 2d 279 , and State v. Aldridge, 204 Kan. 599, 603 , 464 P. 2d 8 .	1	1
United States v. Bucknergreen ca2 · 1940 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1968–1968 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Cross v. City of Kansas City green kan · 1982 2 sentences 1984In Cross of City of Kansas City, 230 Kan. 545, 549 , 638 P.2d 933 (1982), the court stated as follows: “[W]e are of the opinion that a municipality or one of its agencies in the operation of a public waterworks, which also serves as the water supply for fire-fighting purposes, does so in a dual capacity and the furnishing of water for fire fighting is done in a governmental capacity and therefore falls under the cloak of immunity granted by the statute.” (Emphasis added.) While Cross was specifically addressed to the issue of a municipality’s sovereign immunity from suit brought against it, th 1984In Cross of City of Kansas City, 230 Kan. 545, 549 , 638 P.2d 933 (1982), the court stated as follows: “[W]e are of the opinion that a municipality or one of its agencies in the operation of a public waterworks, which also serves as the water supply for fire-fighting purposes, does so in a dual capacity and the furnishing of water for fire fighting is done in a governmental capacity and therefore falls under the cloak of immunity granted by the statute.” (Emphasis added.) While Cross was specifically addressed to the issue of a municipality’s sovereign immunity from suit brought against it, th	1	1984–1984
Raffel v. United States green scotus · 1926 2 sentences 1983"If, therefore, the questions asked of the defendant were logically relevant, and competent within the scope of the rules of cross-examination, they were proper questions, unless there is some reason of policy in the law of evidence which requires their exclusion." 271 U.S. at 496-97 . 1983“If, therefore, the questions asked of the defendant were logically relevant, and competent within the scope of the rules of cross-examination, they were proper questions, unless there is some reason of policy in the law of evidence which requires their exclusion.” 271 U.S. at 496-97 .	1	1983–1983
State v. Schroeder green kan · 1968 2 sentences 1971His failure to deny or 525 explain evidence of incriminating circumstances of which he may have knowledge, may he the basis of adverse inference, and the jury may be so instructed. [Citation.] His waiver is not partial; having once cast aside the cloak of immunity, he may not resume it at will, whenever cross-examination may be inconvenient or embarrassing.” (p. 497.) This language was quoted with approval in the recent case of State v. Schroeder, 201 Kan. 811, 821 , 443 P. 2d 284 . 1971His failure to deny or 525 explain evidence of incriminating circumstances of which he may have knowledge, may he the basis of adverse inference, and the jury may be so instructed. [Citation.] His waiver is not partial; having once cast aside the cloak of immunity, he may not resume it at will, whenever cross-examination may be inconvenient or embarrassing.” (p. 497.) This language was quoted with approval in the recent case of State v. Schroeder, 201 Kan. 811, 821 , 443 P. 2d 284 .	1	1971–1971
Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority green kan · 1957 2 sentences 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute. 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute.	1	1970–1970
State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Kansas Turnpike Authority green kan · 1954 2 sentences 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute. 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute.	1	1970–1970
Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority green kan · 1957 2 sentences 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute. 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute.	1	1970–1970
Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority neutral kan · 1964 2 sentences 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute. 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute.	1	1970–1970
Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority neutral kan · 1958 2 sentences 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute. 1970S. A. 68-2003; Miller v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 193 Kan. 18 , 392 P. 2d 89 ; Hosterman v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 771 183 Kan. 590 , 331 P. 2d 323 ; Anderson Cattle Co. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 749 , 308 P. 2d 172 ; Pennington v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 180 Kan. 638 , 305 P. 2d 849 ; State, ex rel. v. Kansas Turnpike Authority, 176 Kan. 683 , 273 P. 2d 198 .) As such, the authority enjoys the cloak of immunity from tort liability except to the extent expressly waived by statute.	1	1970–1970
Peckham v. United States green · 1953 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1968–1968
United States v. Mortimer green ca2 · 1941 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1968–1968
Viereck v. United States green cadc · 1944 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1968–1968
United States v. Klinger neutral ca2 · 1943 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1968–1968
Walling v. Block neutral scotus · 1944 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1968–1968
McGee v. Kaiser green scotus · 1944 1 sentence 1968See, for example, United States v. Buckner, 108 F. 2d 921 ; United States v. Mortimer, 118 F. 2d 266 ; United States v. Klinger, 136 F. 2d 677 ; Viereck v. United States, 139 F. 2d 847 , cert. den. 321 U. S. 794 , 88 L. ed 1083, 64 S. Ct. 787 ; Beckham v. United States, 210 F. 2d 693 .	1	1968–1968
Caywood v. Board of County Commissioners neutral kan · 1965 2 sentences 1966Within the past year this court was requested to strike down the cloak of immunity as it applies to counties in Caywood v. Board of County Commissioners, 194 Kan. 419 , 399 P. 2d 561 . 1966Within the past year this court was requested to strike down the cloak of immunity as it applies to counties in Caywood v. Board of County Commissioners, 194 Kan. 419 , 399 P. 2d 561 .	1	1966–1966

Where else courts name it

CA 29 (1944–2024) NY 23 (1957–2024) NJ 21 (1956–2024) PA 20 (1979–2026) TX 16 (1956–2023) MI 16 (1984–2024) OH 12 (1974–2014) MD 10 (1974–2024) VA 9 (1983–2010) AL 7 (1983–1994) CT 7 (1931–2014) AZ 7 (1965–2018) FL 7 (1953–1989) KY 7 (1989–2020) KS 6 (1966–1984) MS 6 (1957–1999) GA 6 (1982–2018) IN 5 (1971–2005) NM 5 (1991–2025) ID 4 (1983–1992) IA 4 (1988–2014) IL 4 (1974–2013) OK 4 (1942–2009) DE 3 (2003–2023) UT 3 (1973–2023) MA 3 (1993–2013) SC 3 (1940–2020) CO 3 (1940–1987) NH 2 (1961–1963) OR 2 (1955–2001) WY 2 (1990–2004) TN 2 (2010–2010) MO 2 (1974–1982)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check